2016
DOI: 10.14361/9783839433522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target Markets - International Terrorism Meets Global Capitalism in the Mall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of a broader scholarship on the global 'war on terror', focus still predominantly lies on a critical approach to memorialization, rather than its absence. Memory debates revolve around critical deconstruction of memorials and commemorative forms, mostly in the global North (Edkins, 2003;Foote, 2016;Lundborg, 2012;Milošević, 2018;Sturken, 2007) though with important exceptions (Heath-Kelly, 2015Mirgani, 2017). The existing scholarship follows to an extent a bias of practice -one focused on 'sanctification' (Foote, 2003) of spaces of violence, the rush to commemorate and the ways in which these might reify dominant narratives or security agendas (see, for example, Edkins, 2003 on the commemoration of 9/11).…”
Section: Linking Memory and Security In The War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of a broader scholarship on the global 'war on terror', focus still predominantly lies on a critical approach to memorialization, rather than its absence. Memory debates revolve around critical deconstruction of memorials and commemorative forms, mostly in the global North (Edkins, 2003;Foote, 2016;Lundborg, 2012;Milošević, 2018;Sturken, 2007) though with important exceptions (Heath-Kelly, 2015Mirgani, 2017). The existing scholarship follows to an extent a bias of practice -one focused on 'sanctification' (Foote, 2003) of spaces of violence, the rush to commemorate and the ways in which these might reify dominant narratives or security agendas (see, for example, Edkins, 2003 on the commemoration of 9/11).…”
Section: Linking Memory and Security In The War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Gottdiener [5], the key point is that the public perceives shopping centers as safe. They are crucially seen as a paradigm of safety compared with streets or cities, with their own security personnel and protective measures in their interior, in contrast to urban public spaces that are open and dangerous [30,41,[51][52][53][54].…”
Section: The False Security Of Malls: a Key Factor In Their Appropriation Of Public Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%