“…In terms of a broader scholarship on the global ‘war on terror’, focus still predominantly lies on a critical approach to memorialization, rather than its absence. Memory debates revolve around critical deconstruction of memorials and commemorative forms, mostly in the global North (Edkins, 2003; Foote, 2016; Lundborg, 2012; Milošević, 2018; Sturken, 2007) though with important exceptions (Heath-Kelly, 2015, 2016a; Mirgani, 2017). The existing scholarship follows to an extent a bias of practice – one focused on ‘sanctification’ (Foote, 2003) of spaces of violence, the rush to commemorate and the ways in which these might reify dominant narratives or security agendas (see, for example, Edkins, 2003 on the commemoration of 9/11).…”