2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target-oriented augmentation privacy-protection domain adaptation for imbalanced ECG beat classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, lower classification performance for S and V class samples is also reported in [16] and [51] where data augmentation methods are used to tackle imbalanced data issues. In comparison to [16], [40], [51], our proposed method achieved a better performance score for the most crucial class of S and V beats. These results substantiate previous findings in literature [52].…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, lower classification performance for S and V class samples is also reported in [16] and [51] where data augmentation methods are used to tackle imbalanced data issues. In comparison to [16], [40], [51], our proposed method achieved a better performance score for the most crucial class of S and V beats. These results substantiate previous findings in literature [52].…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The classification results of [40] presented in Table V depict that generating minority samples from minority class samples via SMOTE causes over-fitting on minority class samples [52] and, therefore, a lower sensitivity score is achieved for S and V class samples in [40]. Similarly, lower classification performance for S and V class samples is also reported in [16] and [51] where data augmentation methods are used to tackle imbalanced data issues. In comparison to [16], [40], [51], our proposed method achieved a better performance score for the most crucial class of S and V beats.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations