2012
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2012.678562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target Strength Measurements of Juvenile Blueback Herring from the Mohawk River, New York

Abstract: Target strength (TS) was estimated from in situ and ex situ measurements of juvenile blueback herring Alosa aestivalis during their fall downriver migration at the Crescent Hydroelectric Project in the Mohawk River, New York. The blueback herring is an ecologically important anadromous species that must transit fish passage facilities at hydroelectric dams. Measurements of TS are necessary to distinguish juvenile blueback herring from other fishes as well as to scale echo integration results to numerical fish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direction of the horizontal transducers across the river channel was assumed to generally produce a side-aspect TS distribution when fish swim through the beam during their downstream migration. The TS mode observed by horizontal transducers ranged from ¡50 to ¡44 dB, which was similar in magnitude to Gurshin (2012) and Brooking and Rudstam (2009). The estimates used for the net rate of downstream or upstream movement (averaged 2.4-2.6 body lengths/s) were consistent with the range of swimming speeds reported for Alewives from previous split-beam tracking by Arrhenius et al (2000).…”
Section: Meanssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direction of the horizontal transducers across the river channel was assumed to generally produce a side-aspect TS distribution when fish swim through the beam during their downstream migration. The TS mode observed by horizontal transducers ranged from ¡50 to ¡44 dB, which was similar in magnitude to Gurshin (2012) and Brooking and Rudstam (2009). The estimates used for the net rate of downstream or upstream movement (averaged 2.4-2.6 body lengths/s) were consistent with the range of swimming speeds reported for Alewives from previous split-beam tracking by Arrhenius et al (2000).…”
Section: Meanssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…All fish were released back to the river. The target strength (TS) distribution of the Blueback Herring catch was estimated from the TS-TL relation for Alewife (Warner et al 2002), which is also representative of juvenile Blueback Herring (Gurshin 2012).…”
Section: Trawl Sampling Of Fish Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the low salinity levels at the surface (typically less than 5‰) we can infer that the fish using this habitat must be euryhaline fish such as (but not limited to) river herring, Atlantic Tomcod, or Rainbow Smelt. The TS range (<−42 dB) also suggests that many of the fish targets we detected in the middle estuary throughout the year were young of year fish potentially using this area as a nursery (e.g., Rudstam et al 2003;Gurshin 2012). Diadromous fish using northeastern U.S. estuaries for juvenile rearing has been noted in other systems (Grabe 1996) and is also likely to be important in the Penobscot estuary (e.g., MDMR and MDIFW 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Fish track detection settings were: TS threshold = −55 dB, minimum number of single targets in a track = 1, and maximum gap between single targets = 0. We used the −55 dB threshold to filter out weak backscatter to focus on postlarval fish responses only; the target strength of many of the main species inhabiting the estuary (e.g., Saunders et al 2006) have been estimated empirically (e.g., Foote 1987;Rudstam et al 2003;Simmonds and MacLennan 2005;Gurshin 2012).…”
Section: Hydroacoustics and Pelagic Fish Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous studies (Boswell & Wilson, 2008;Frouzova et al, 2005;Gurshin, 2012;Kubecka & Wittingerova, 1998;Lilja et al, 2000;Rudstam et al, 2003) show that the target strengths obtained from lateral orientations are greater than the target strengths obtained from oblique or head-tail orientations. This difference can be explained by the increased exposure of the body surface of the fish when it is at a perpendicular position, exposing its swim bladder (Boswell & Wilson, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%