2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target tracking using Interactive Multiple Model for Wireless Sensor Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We simply assume that the average number of preamble transmissions is the arithmetic mean between the best case and the worst case. 43 v d r can be calculated using the following formula where r r d p is the energy used to receive a packet and (r r d r + r t d ack ) is the energy used to receive the preamble and transmission of ACK message. 43 The energy of the LPL operation can be calculated by the following formula…”
Section: Analysis Of Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simply assume that the average number of preamble transmissions is the arithmetic mean between the best case and the worst case. 43 v d r can be calculated using the following formula where r r d p is the energy used to receive a packet and (r r d r + r t d ack ) is the energy used to receive the preamble and transmission of ACK message. 43 The energy of the LPL operation can be calculated by the following formula…”
Section: Analysis Of Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conte et al studied on how to track underwater targets [16], Asmaa et al introduced target tracking in wireless sensor networks [17]. Moreover, there are other studies about target tracking, such as underwater passive target tracking [18], target tracking with range-only information [19], target tracking using interactive multiple model [20], target tracking utilizing underwater wireless sensor networks [21], multi-target tracking with multi-bernoulli filter [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indoor positioning methods mentioned above have certain limitations, and hence, a method based on the wireless sensor network (WSN) and received signal strength indicator (RSSI) is more applicable. (10,11) Lin et al used an optimized fingerprint-based positioning algorithm to achieve a positioning accuracy of higher than 3.5 m in a garage. (12) In this work, we optimize the general radio-propagation-model-based localization algorithm to achieve an accuracy of higher than 4 m. On the other hand, an improved general regression neural network (GRNN) positioning method based on an optimized method is proposed to make the positioning accuracy higher than 2.4 m.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%