2019
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted capture of Chinese hamster ovary host cell proteins: Peptide ligand binding by proteomic analysis

Abstract: The clearance of host cell proteins (HCPs) is of crucial importance in biomanufacturing, given their diversity in composition, structure, abundance, and occasional structural homology with the product. The current approach to HCP clearance in the manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) relies on product capture with Protein A followed by removal of residual HCPs in flow‐through mode using ion exchange or mixed‐mode chromatography. Recent studies have highlighted the presence of “problematic HCP” species,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting profiles of Y pIgG and Q PP vs. loading volume are reported in Figure 9C,E; the corresponding profiles of C pIgG /C pIgG * are reported in Figure S6. The loading of 20‐fold diluted plasma (pIgG ~0.6 mg/ml; non‐Ig plasma proteins ~3.9 mg/ml) resulted in efficient flow‐through purification: at the cut‐off loading (10 CVs), the cumulative pIgG purity in the effluent reached 98.1% (Figure 10A); the global yield, on the other hand, reached 25.4% only: the low protein concentration in the feedstock is unlikely to match the high binding capacity of the second‐generation LigaGuard™ and prevent undesired capture of IgG via weak partitioning mechanism, as described in prior work 26,27 . Accordingly, the loading of 10‐fold diluted plasma resulted in a significant increase in pIgG yield with high purity; specifically, at the loading volume of 4.0 ml (8 CVs), Y pIgG and Q PP , respectively, reached approximately 71% and 27 mg per ml resin, corresponding to a cumulative product purity of approximatley 80%; beyond this point, however, a significant amount of non‐Ig proteins flow through the column, lowering product purity to approximatley 70% at the loading volume of 5.5 ml (Figure 10B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting profiles of Y pIgG and Q PP vs. loading volume are reported in Figure 9C,E; the corresponding profiles of C pIgG /C pIgG * are reported in Figure S6. The loading of 20‐fold diluted plasma (pIgG ~0.6 mg/ml; non‐Ig plasma proteins ~3.9 mg/ml) resulted in efficient flow‐through purification: at the cut‐off loading (10 CVs), the cumulative pIgG purity in the effluent reached 98.1% (Figure 10A); the global yield, on the other hand, reached 25.4% only: the low protein concentration in the feedstock is unlikely to match the high binding capacity of the second‐generation LigaGuard™ and prevent undesired capture of IgG via weak partitioning mechanism, as described in prior work 26,27 . Accordingly, the loading of 10‐fold diluted plasma resulted in a significant increase in pIgG yield with high purity; specifically, at the loading volume of 4.0 ml (8 CVs), Y pIgG and Q PP , respectively, reached approximately 71% and 27 mg per ml resin, corresponding to a cumulative product purity of approximatley 80%; beyond this point, however, a significant amount of non‐Ig proteins flow through the column, lowering product purity to approximatley 70% at the loading volume of 5.5 ml (Figure 10B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prior work, we demonstrated the use of LigaGuard™ resin as a scrubber of process‐related impurities prior to the affinity capture step in a process purification for monoclonal antibodies 26,27 . In analogy to that study, we attempted the purification of pIgG from plasma using a two‐column process comprising a LigaGuard™ adsorbent that captures the non‐Ig plasma proteins in flow‐through followed by a LigaTrap™ adsorbent that operates in bind‐and‐elute mode to isolate and concentrate pIgG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following on these results, we proceeded with the flow-through purification of pIgG from cryo-rich plasma using the second-generation LigaGuard adsorbent. This was imputed to the protein concentration in the feedstock being inadequate to match the higher binding capacity of the second-generation LigaGuard adsorbent: specifically, the titer of non-Ig plasma proteins was insufficient to prevent undesired capture of IgG or displace the bound pIgG molecules via the weak partitioning mechanism described in prior work [ 26,27 ]. We therefore adjusted loading conditions by reducing the dilution of the feedstock to 10-fold and 5-fold, which increased the titer of pIgG to˜1.0 and 2.0 mg/mL, and non-Ig plasma proteins to˜7.2 and 14.5 mg/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Hosted Filementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prior work, we have demonstrated the use of LigaGuard TM resin as a scrubber of process-related impurities prior to the Protein A-based affinity capture step in a process of antibody purification from CHO cell culture fluids [ 26,27 ]. In analogy to that study, we attempted the purification of pIgG from plasma using a twocolumn process comprising a LigaGuard adsorbent that captures the non-Ig plasma proteins in flow-through followed by a LigaTrap TM adsorbent that operates in bind-and-elute mode to isolate and concentrate pIgG.…”
Section: Capture-polishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation