2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Development of Registries of Biological Parts

Abstract: BackgroundThe design and construction of novel biological systems by combining basic building blocks represents a dominant paradigm in synthetic biology. Creating and maintaining a database of these building blocks is a way to streamline the fabrication of complex constructs. The Registry of Standard Biological Parts (Registry) is the most advanced implementation of this idea.Methods/Principal FindingsBy analyzing inclusion relationships between the sequences of the Registry entries, we build a network that ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This power arises from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts which can be further maintained and improved when a quality control of the BioBricks is included in order to maximize the benefits for its users [Peccoud et al 2008]. In addition, the reusability of biological parts will also be slightly improved by systematically disclosing annotated sequence information when reporting synthetic gene networks in research articles, as recently addressed by Peccoud et al [2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This power arises from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts which can be further maintained and improved when a quality control of the BioBricks is included in order to maximize the benefits for its users [Peccoud et al 2008]. In addition, the reusability of biological parts will also be slightly improved by systematically disclosing annotated sequence information when reporting synthetic gene networks in research articles, as recently addressed by Peccoud et al [2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the collection is mostly used and produced by undergraduate students, and quality control is not optimal, the large number of items and their inclusion as standardized parts has made the registry a very valuable resource for many synthetic biology endeavors (125)(126)(127)(128).…”
Section: Repositories Of Plasmid-related Parts and Devices: The Seva mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have commented that they have started using BioBrick-style approaches to help restructure their laboratory practices, but this stage a majority of the synthetic biologists I have spoken with have not made their personal collections of biological parts available to a public repository like the Registry of Standard Biological Parts, providing justifications ranging from laziness to concerns over ownership. Nor do many of them use others' parts from the MIT Registry, citing problems with reliability and a lack of part characterization data as key issues (see also Peccoud et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Moral Economy Of Synthetic Biology: Balancing Academic mentioning
confidence: 99%