2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted drug delivery to the brain endothelium dominates over passive delivery via vascular leak in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, direct targeting of the blood–brain barrier via transferrin receptor results in low levels of tissue uptake (≤1%ID/g) and no specificity for sites of injury. , In the present work and in our recent publications, we describe the use of CAM targeting to provide specific delivery to the injured brain. We achieved high levels (∼4%ID/g) of delivery to the brain by targeting to PECAM in the brain; however, similar to targets such as transferrin receptor, PECAM does not provide specificity for injured regions . We have recently reported studies of targeting to the brain in the same injury model described here (TNF-α), but with injection of targeting ligands occurring the day after injury (rather than 2 h postinjury in this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, direct targeting of the blood–brain barrier via transferrin receptor results in low levels of tissue uptake (≤1%ID/g) and no specificity for sites of injury. , In the present work and in our recent publications, we describe the use of CAM targeting to provide specific delivery to the injured brain. We achieved high levels (∼4%ID/g) of delivery to the brain by targeting to PECAM in the brain; however, similar to targets such as transferrin receptor, PECAM does not provide specificity for injured regions . We have recently reported studies of targeting to the brain in the same injury model described here (TNF-α), but with injection of targeting ligands occurring the day after injury (rather than 2 h postinjury in this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Targeted drug delivery to the brain promises breakthroughs in treatment of debilitating and lethal pathologies, including stroke, traumatic brain injury, glioblastoma and other brain tumors, meningitis, and neurodegenerative diseases. , Various carriers with distinct chemistry, geometry, mechanical flexibility, and affinity have been devised to achieve this elusive goal. One approach to enhancing delivery employs targeting to and across the cerebral vasculature using antibodies, peptides, and other ligands of molecules that are stably expressed on the luminal surface of brain vessels. However, targeting these molecules, including receptors for transferrin, insulin, and growth factors, does not provide selectivity for sites of injury and inflammation. , In order to achieve enhanced specificity for injured regions of the brain, targeting inducible cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on endothelial cells, such as vascular CAM (VCAM), has been tested and has shown improved delivery and pharmacologic effects. Despite these inroads, direct, specific delivery to the parenchyma of the injured region of the brain remains an elusive goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, nanocarriers are easily recognized by phagocytes once entering the blood stream and accumulate in the liver and spleen. Our lab has extensively studied the comparison of antibody vs. nanocarriers in various animal models of acute injuries, and have previously found other pathologies (e.g., acute lung injury) that dramatically change the pharmacokinetics profiles of antibodies and nanocarriers [ 21 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first showed VCAM-1-based targeting to the brain is greatly augmented in a mouse model of acute neurovascular inflammation [ 21 ]. More recently, we showed VCAM-1-targeting significantly outperforms untargeted IgG-conjugated nanocarriers in a mouse model of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke [ 30 , 31 ]. Compliance with the finding of previous studies, this TBI study showed augmented VCAM-1-targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much has been written comparing affinity moiety targeting and physicochemical tropism. , Advantages cited for affinity moieties include a known mechanism of action, enabling rational engineering. Physicochemical targeting usually does not have a known mechanism of action (ApoE binding is a rare exception), and therefore, rational engineering is difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%