Targeted Medical School Admissions: A Strategic Process for Meeting Our Social Mission

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Increased medical school class sizes and new medical schools have not addressed the workforce inadequacies in primary care or underserved settings. While there is substantial evidence that student attributes predict practice specialty and location, little is known about how schools use these factors in admissions processes. We sought to describe admissions strategies to recruit students likely to practice in primary care or underserved settings. Methods: We surveyed admissions personnel at US allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in 2018 about targeted admissions strategies aimed at recruitment and selection of students likely to practice rurally, in urban underserved areas, or in primary care Results: One hundred thirty-three of 185 (71.8%) US medical schools responded. Respondents reported targeted admissions strategies as follows: rural, 69.2%; urban underserved, 67.4%; and primary care, 45.3%. Nearly 90% reported some type of recruitment outreach to 4-year universities, but much less to community colleges. Student characteristics used to identify those likely to practice in targeted areas were largely evidence-based. Strategies to select students varied widely. Conclusions: Most responding US medical schools reported a targeted process to recruit and select students likely to practice in rural, urban underserved, or primary care settings, indicating widespread awareness of workforce challenges. This study also demonstrates varying approaches to and allocation of resources toward admissions targeting, especially the application and interviewing processes. Understanding how schools identify and admit students likely to practice in these fields is a first step in identifying best practices for selective admissions focused on addressing workforce gaps.

What Moves Physicians to Work in Rural Areas? An In-Depth Examination of Physician Practice Location Decisions

“…Unfortunately, the significant decline in medical school enrollment of rural students (Jaret, 2020; Shipman et al, 2019) indicates a critical need to build, strengthen, and support the rural pipeline. To address this, many medical schools in the United States have implemented targeted recruitment and mission-based admissions to attract students from rural backgrounds (Evans et al, 2020; Schmitz et al, 2020). Longenecker et al (2020) found that although fewer than 10% of medical schools explicitly commit to producing rural physicians, nearly 65% provide some rural clinical experiences.…”

Health workforce retention in low-income settings: an application of the Root Stem Model

“…The former President of South Africa, Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, once said “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” [ 34 ]. Neither the United States [ 35 ] nor Ireland [ 36 ] solved its problem of retaining its medical workforce for underserved areas by increasing the numbers of medical students. The qualities of doctors proved to be more important.…”

“…Worldwide most medical schools remain in urban areas [ 35 , 39 ] and adapt medical students to urban environments. Medical schools could establish satellite rural campuses for at least some courses.…”

The Role of Rural Graduate Medical Education in Improving Rural Health and Health Care

“…Correcting the existing workforce shortages in rural America with intentional family medicine GME will save lives while contributing to the economic basis of local health care, keeping both patients and health care economic investment close to home. Literature exists addressing the rural placement rates as related to admission of students, 4 undergraduate medical education, 5 recruitment, and retention strategies employed. 6 As we take up our role in GME for rural practice, 7 the core concept of situational adaptation applies.…”