Targeted Perioperative Nursing Combined with Propofol and Fentanyl for Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effects of targeted perioperative nursing combined with propofol and fentanyl in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods. Patients who were admitted to our hospital for gynecological laparoscopic surgeries from October 1, 2019 to November 30, 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Patients in group A received routine propofol and fentanyl. Patients in group B received targeted perioperative nursing on the basis of interventions in group A. The anesthetic effects, clinical indicators, mental health status, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 84 qualified patients were retrieved. The total effective anesthesia rate, extubation time, operation time, consciousness recovery time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, SAS score, SDS score, health status indicators, and adverse events in group B were all significantly better than those in group A ( P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion. Combined intervention (propofol + fentanyl + targeted perioperative care) for gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients has a significant anesthesia effect, which can effectively improve the patient's clinical indicators and mental health status and can also reduce the occurrence of adverse events. It has good safety and can be widely used in clinical practice.

Retracted: Targeted Perioperative Nursing Combined with Propofol and Fentanyl for Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”