2010
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01590-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Its Potential Use To Guide Empiric Antibiotic Therapy

Abstract: The present study aimed to determine the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-positive clinical culture among hospitalized adults in different risk categories of a targeted MRSA active surveillance screening program and to assess the utility of screening in guiding empiric antibiotic therapy. We completed a prospective cohort study in which all adults admitted to non-intensive-care-unit locations who had no history of MRSA colonization or infection received targeted screening for MRS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although multiple studies have attempted to determine the utility of the MRSA nasal swab for predicting MRSA infection, significant heterogeneity exists with regard to the use of PCR versus chromogenic culture medium, body site sampled for colonization, and timing (8,11,12,39,40). The two largest of these studies, a retrospective review by Robicsek et al (11) and a prospective analysis by Harris et al (8), both suggest that the nasal MRSA PCR (GeneOhm; Becton, Dickinson and Company) demonstrates a modest PPV but an NPV greater than 98% for MRSA infection at any body site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although multiple studies have attempted to determine the utility of the MRSA nasal swab for predicting MRSA infection, significant heterogeneity exists with regard to the use of PCR versus chromogenic culture medium, body site sampled for colonization, and timing (8,11,12,39,40). The two largest of these studies, a retrospective review by Robicsek et al (11) and a prospective analysis by Harris et al (8), both suggest that the nasal MRSA PCR (GeneOhm; Becton, Dickinson and Company) demonstrates a modest PPV but an NPV greater than 98% for MRSA infection at any body site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases, cultures are negative and clinicians must determine in whom antibiotics can be safely de-escalated. S. aureus, including MRSA, colonizes the nares (2-6), and colonization has been shown to be a predictor of future clinical infection (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). MRSA nasal colonization can be accurately detected using the nasal swab PCR test (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies to date have examined the predictive value of screening for MRSA. Most were limited to swabs obtained either on admission 23 or within 24 hours of a clinical infection, and included all clinical infections. 19 Strymish and colleagues 24 studied the utility of prior screening in predicting the results of preoperative screening for MRSA, and found a similar specificity to that found to our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Data in the CDR have been validated against patients' paper medical charts and have demonstrated predictive values exceeding 99 %. 22,23 To determine whether home medications were continued, we abstracted medication information from patient discharge summaries.…”
Section: Baseline Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%