2020
DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000001550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Temperature Management in Cardiac Arrest Patients With an Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background: Targeted temperature management (TTM) is now recommended for patients presenting with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, there are limited data that support its use in patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm (NSR). Methods: A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted by two independent authors for studies that compared TTM along with standard care versus standard care alone in treating car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous frequentist meta-analyses of TTM have reported an overall (considering all studies regardless of initial rhythm, TTM characteristics and times for outcome assessment) non-significant effect on survival and a variable but mostly favourable effect on neurological outcomes by TTM 32–34 [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 45 ]. Reviews of TTM in post-cardiac arrest care using expanded inclusion criteria and including retrospective, observational cohort studies, while unsuitable to inform clinical practice, have reported a benefit of TTM 32–34 [ 4 , 46 ]. Two recent meta-analyses including the TTM2 trial concluded that various levels of hypothermic TTM may not improve survival or neurological outcome compared to normothermia [ 47 , 48 ] while associated with higher incidence of arrhythmias [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous frequentist meta-analyses of TTM have reported an overall (considering all studies regardless of initial rhythm, TTM characteristics and times for outcome assessment) non-significant effect on survival and a variable but mostly favourable effect on neurological outcomes by TTM 32–34 [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 45 ]. Reviews of TTM in post-cardiac arrest care using expanded inclusion criteria and including retrospective, observational cohort studies, while unsuitable to inform clinical practice, have reported a benefit of TTM 32–34 [ 4 , 46 ]. Two recent meta-analyses including the TTM2 trial concluded that various levels of hypothermic TTM may not improve survival or neurological outcome compared to normothermia [ 47 , 48 ] while associated with higher incidence of arrhythmias [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study heterogeneity in previous [ 4 10 ] and recent [ 47 – 50 ] systematic reviews and meta-analyses has been moderate to high [ 51 ] and largely related to studies where hypothermia was compared to no temperature control including a proportion of patients with febrile temperatures. The addition of the recent study by Dankiewicz et al [ 17 ] to the cumulative evidence has reduced heterogeneity given its sample size and protocolised avoidance of fever, similar to the original study by Nielsen et al [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is still a weak recommendation and is from very low-quality evidence. So far, there have been 3 meta-analyses published on this topic with inconsistent results (7)(8)(9). However, the main problem of these articles was the inclusion of most observational studies but only a small number of RCTs, leading to a high risk of bias and random error in these studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the guidelines recommend TTM for CA survivors with SR or NSR (3). However, compared with CA survivors with SR having conclusive evidence of TTM to support their use, studies focusing on TTM for NSR survivors have reported conflicting results (7)(8)(9). Most current clinical recommendations are based on the consensus of expert opinions and extrapolate the potential benefits of TTM in NSR patients from the evidence of SR survivors (3,4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%