2004
DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-5769-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
356
2
48

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(412 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
356
2
48
Order By: Relevance
“…Errors of exclusion and inclusion provide an idea of which households benefit but not of the actual extent of those benefits (Coady et al, 2004). This deficiency can be overcome by indicators of benefit incidence.…”
Section: Distributional Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors of exclusion and inclusion provide an idea of which households benefit but not of the actual extent of those benefits (Coady et al, 2004). This deficiency can be overcome by indicators of benefit incidence.…”
Section: Distributional Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting poor households is, however, a non-trivial endeavor in many developing countries which often do not have systematic household/individual level income or consumption data (van de Walle 1998). Proxy means testing can be used as an alternative targeting method but its use so far has been largely limited to middle-income countries because it is administratively challenging (Coady, Grosh, and Hoddinott 2004). Furthermore, in many developing countries households under-invest in female education and health due to complex socio-economic factors, often necessitating gender-targeted interventions (Ezeminari, Chaudhury, and Owens 2000) 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting exclusion errors can sometimes cause misleading assessments of targeting. From a metasurvey of targeted programs, Coady, Grosh, and Hoddinot (2004) conclude that with all its errors, a proxy-based means testing offers significant improvements in targeting. However, this conclusion is based entirely on looking at the share of the poor in the total subsidy as a measure of targeting performance.…”
Section: Targeting Performance and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%