2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting sites for habitat creation: an investigation into alternative scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where natural areas are deficient, they could be nurtured with the careful site and soil preparation and native plant species to emulate regional wooded ecosystems (Johnston 1990;Lee and Thompson 2005). Disturbed natural areas could be repaired or restored by enrichment planting and elimination of undesirable elements to foster reconstitution of natural ecosystem (Borgmann and Rodewald 2005).…”
Section: Protecting Nature-in-city Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where natural areas are deficient, they could be nurtured with the careful site and soil preparation and native plant species to emulate regional wooded ecosystems (Johnston 1990;Lee and Thompson 2005). Disturbed natural areas could be repaired or restored by enrichment planting and elimination of undesirable elements to foster reconstitution of natural ecosystem (Borgmann and Rodewald 2005).…”
Section: Protecting Nature-in-city Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend in benefit mapping studies is linked to the increased research interest in multifunctional land use and ecosystem services, and the increased availability and accessibility of computers, modelling software and (georeferenced) data. These developments also explain why in more recent years there has been a strong increase in the number and diversity of studies looking at the efficiency of spatial targeting of land use policy interventions for the provision of non-market goods (Yang et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004;Groeneveld et al, 2005;Lant et al, 2005;Lee and Thompson, 2005;Messer, 2006;Bailey et al, 2006;Saroinsong et al, 2007). These studies demonstrate time and again that better spatial targeting can in principle result in better value for money.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, heavily disturbed systems should be given lowest priority, as they may not recover without massive human intervention (Goodwin et al 1997). Restoration actions include the use of riparian vegetative buffer strips (Osborne and Barling and Moore 1994;Parkyn et al 2003), reducing patch perimeter-area ratio (Lee and Thompson 2005), road decommissioning (Roni et al 2002;Switalski et al 2004), NCD, and channel reconfiguration (Roni et al 2002;Parkyn et al 2003). All model-predicted candidate sites for restoration need to be field-checked and must account for the degree of community support, quality of surroundings and upland areas, and the problem being mitigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%