[11][12][13] However, none of these Cp/Cp* ruthenium complexes has been tested under hypoxic conditions. Some diphosphines have demonstrated cytotoxicity against various cell lines, 14 but it has been observed that, upon coordination to metals, diphosphines produce complexes with improved anticancer activity compared to the free ligands; a general hypothesis considers that the metal protects the ligands from oxidation before they interact with the corresponding biological target. 15 Here we present the results obtained from cell line assays carried out under normoxic and hypoxic conditions with ruthenium complexes containing chelating diphosphine ligands such as 1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene (Xantphos). The complexes have general structures [RuCp*(PP)Cl] (1, PP = dppm; 4, PP = Xantphos), [RuCp # (PP)Cl] (Cp # = C 5 Me 4 (CH 2 ) 5 OH; 2, PP = dppm; 5, PP = Xantphos) and [RuCp*(PP)(CH 3 CN)][SbF 6 ] (3, PP = dppm). We investigated the biological activity of both ligands and the effect of complexation. We were interested in assessing the impact of hydrophilic functionalisation of Cp* with an -OH group and the different cytotoxicities shown by analogous neutral and charged complexes. The anticancer activities were assessed against A2780 and HT-29 cell lines, for HT-29 both at 21% and 0.1% O 2 (hypoxic conditions) concentrations. = chiral diphosphines. 22 The structure of complex 3 was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 3 crystallised in a triclinic cell from pentane/chloroform, and the structural solution was performed in the space group P ̅ . The asymmetric unit comprises one molecule of compound 3, including the counterion SbF 6 . The molecular structure of 3 is shown in Figure 1 and selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1. Compound 3 presents the characteristic pianostool geometry typical of η 5 -and η 6 -organometallic ruthenium species. The N(1)-C(11) triple bond length is 1.153(2) Å.
Results and DiscussionScheme 1. General synthesis of complexes 1, 2, 4 and 5.Scheme 2. Synthesis of complex 3. Figure 1. ORTEP structure of complex 3 (cation) with thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.The cytotoxic activities of compounds 1-5, along with cisplatin, dppm and Xantphos were tested on the A2780 and HT-29 cell lines after five-day exposures at 37 ºC and 21% O 2 . The IC 50 results are shown in Table 2. The most active complexes were those formed from dppm, 1, 2 and 3, all with better cytotoxicities, in the nanomolar range, than cisplatin for both HT-29 and A2780 cell lines. Dppm was active by itself, with IC 50 values below 1.5 µM. However, 1 H and 31 P NMR spectroscopy experiments in deuterated DMSO showed no decoordination of dppm from complexes 1 and 3 after five days. The observation that diphosphines do not dissociate is further reinforced by the fact that complexes 4 and 5 gave moderate to good activities, which are not due to a possible release of the ligand, because Xantph...