Abstract-Yield-per-recruit and spawn ing-biomass-per-recruit models, are commonly used for evaluating the status of a fishery. In practice, model parameters are themselves usually estimates that are subject to both bias (uncertainty in the mean) and imprecision (uncertainty in the standard deviation). Using Monte Carlo simulation with data for female Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) from the Kao-Ping River in Taiwan, we examined the sensitivity of such models to different degrees of bias and imprecision in the life history parameters. Positive biases in natural mortality and the von Bertalanffy growth coefficient led to larger relative changes in the mean and standard deviation of estimated fishing-mortality-based biological reference points (F BRPs ) than did changes under negative biases. Higher degrees of imprecision in parameters did not affect the means of F BRPs, but their standard deviations increased. Composite risks of overfishing depended mainly on the changes in the means of F BRPs rather than on their standard deviations. Therefore, reducing the biases in key life history parameters, as well as the bias and imprecision in the current rate of fishing mortality, may be the most relevant approach for obtaining correct estimates of the risks of overfishing.Yield-per-recruit (YPR) and spawning-biomass-per-recruit (SPR) models, in which the total yield or spawning biomass of a cohort is standardized for the numbers of recruits, are commonly used in fisheries assessment (Beverton and Holt, 1957;Quinn and Deriso, 1999). They can be used to infer the total yield and spawning biomass of an entire population composed of different cohorts with an assumption of a steady state and with knowledge of equilibrium recruitment (King, 2007). Several fishing-mortality-based biological reference points (F BRPs ) derived from YPR and SPR models can be used to evaluate whether the yield per recruit is optimal or the spawning biomass per recruit is sufficient for the population to persist under current fishing pressure.Uncertainties in the parameters of such models are inevitable and result from observation and process error (Charles, 1998). Ignoring uncertainties in parameters can lead to incorrect estimation of F BRPs , and consequently the examination of fishery status could be misleading, given the cases of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) (Chen and Wilson, 2002), green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) (Grabowski and Chen, 2004), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) (Jiao et al., 2005), pronghorn spiny lobster (Panulirus penicillatus) (Chang et al., 2009), and Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) (Lin et al., 2010a).Estimation of natural mortality (M) is challenging (Vetter, 1988) because both its mean and variance are prone to considerable uncertainty. For example, the estimates of M have varied among different empirical methods (Pascual and Iribarne, 1993;Lin and Sun, 2013). The variances of M estimates also have differed among approaches (e.g., Cubillos et al., 1999, versus Hall et al., 2004Lin et al., 201...