2003
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2003)023<0349:talfmo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targets and Limits for Management of Fisheries: A Simple Probability-Based Approach

Abstract: Precautionary fishery management requires that a distinction be made between target and limit reference points. We present a simple probability framework for deriving a target reference point for the fishing mortality rate (F) or biomass (B) from the corresponding limit reference point. Our framework is a generalization of one devised previously by Caddy and McGarvey (1996). Both methods require an a priori management decision on the allowable probability of exceeding the limit reference point; our method remo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reference points F max and F 0.1 can be regarded as boundaries in order to constrain harvesting below the level within which the fish population can produce maximum sustainable yield (United Nations, 1995), and they usually are used as limiting and precautionary indicators of growth overfishing, respectively; fishing mortality rates above F max indicate that fish are caught before they reach optimal size given the rate of natural mortality and their growth rate (Gabriel and Mace, 1999;Quinn and Deriso, 1999). Fishing mortalities at 30% and 50% of SPR, compared with SPR at F=0, are considered to be the limiting and precautionary levels for anguillid eels (ICES 1 ).…”
Section: Ypr and Spr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reference points F max and F 0.1 can be regarded as boundaries in order to constrain harvesting below the level within which the fish population can produce maximum sustainable yield (United Nations, 1995), and they usually are used as limiting and precautionary indicators of growth overfishing, respectively; fishing mortality rates above F max indicate that fish are caught before they reach optimal size given the rate of natural mortality and their growth rate (Gabriel and Mace, 1999;Quinn and Deriso, 1999). Fishing mortalities at 30% and 50% of SPR, compared with SPR at F=0, are considered to be the limiting and precautionary levels for anguillid eels (ICES 1 ).…”
Section: Ypr and Spr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because F cur and the F BRPs are not fixed constants, we applied composite risk analysis that allowed for the incorporation of the uncertainty in both indicator and management reference points (Prager et al, 2003;Jiao et al, 2005). By the discrete approach proposed by Jiao et al (2005), the composite risks were calculated as the expected probability of one random variable being larger than another.…”
Section: Calculation Of Composite Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations