Tari̇hsel Depremleri̇n Yeni̇den Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇ne Örnek Bi̇r Çalişma: 1789 Palu (Elaziğ) Depremi̇, Doğu Anadolu, Türki̇ye

Köküm, Mehmet; Özçeli̇k, Fatih

doi:10.19111/bulletinofmre.603929

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…DAF Türkiye'nin doğusunda yer alan, Anadolu ile Arap Levhalarının çarpışmasına bağlı olarak oluşan doğrultu atımlı bir fay sistemidir [13]. DAF zonu yer yer genişliği 30 km uzunluğu ise 580 km'yi bulan, Karlıova (Bingöl) ile İskenderun körfezi arasında uzanan kuzeydoğu doğrultulu fay sistemidir [14,15] DAF, tarih boyunca pek çok yıkıcı depreme kaynaklık etmiştir [15]. DAF üzerinde gerçekleşen son yıkıcı depremler, 06.02.2023 günü, Türkiye saati ile 04:17'de ve 13:24'de sırası ile merkez üssü Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) ve Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) olan Mw 7.7 ve Mw 7.6 büyüklüğünde iki deprem meydana gelmiştir [1].…”

Section: Kahramanmaraş Depremlerinin Karakteristik öZellikleriunclassified

2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Sonrası Malatya İlinde Yer Alan Yığma Binaların Hasar Mekanizmasının İncelenmesi

ÖZMEN,

TAŞ,

İNCE

et al. 2024

NÖHÜ Müh. Bilim. Derg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

6 Şubat 2023 tarihinde, yerel saatle 04:17 ve 13:24'te, sırasıyla Pazarcık ve Elbistan'da (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) iki yıkıcı deprem meydana gelmiştir. İlk deprem 8,6 kilometre derinlikte (Mw=7,7) büyüklüğünde, ikinci deprem ise 7 kilometre derinlikte (Mw=7,6) büyüklüğünde meydana gelmiştir. Depremler, toplam nüfusu yaklaşık 15 milyon olan Hatay, Adıyaman, Gaziantep, Malatya, Kilis, Diyarbakır, Adana, Osmaniye, Şanlıurfa ve Elâzığ’da hissedilmiştir. Türkiye'de 50.783, Suriye'de ise 8476 can kaybı olduğu bildirilmiştir. Ayrıca 214.577 bina yıkılmış ya da ağır hasar görmüştür. Bu çalışmada, Malatya ilinde mevcut yığma binaların hasar mekanizmaları değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca yönetmeliklerde verilen depreme dayanıklı yığma yapı tasarım kuralları üzerinde durulmuştur.

show abstract

Section: Kahramanmaraş Depremlerinin Karakteristik öZellikleriunclassified

2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Sonrası Malatya İlinde Yer Alan Yığma Binaların Hasar Mekanizmasının İncelenmesi

ÖZMEN,

TAŞ,

İNCE

et al. 2024

NÖHÜ Müh. Bilim. Derg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It continues to the southwest until it meets another ripple convergence at the conjunction of the EAF, the Cyprus subduction arc, and the Dead Sea Transform fault (Figure 1), which is a transform boundary between the Arabian and Sinai plates as they converge into Eurasia (10)(11)(12)(13). Devastating earthquakes occurred on the EAF during both historical and instrumental periods (14)(15)(16)(17). The studies of earthquake source mechanisms show that the faulting along the eastern part of the EAF is dominated by a stress regime with horizontal maximum and minimum compressional stresses, characterized by pure left-lateral strike-slip faulting (18)(19).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preliminary Analysis of the Aftershock Sequence of the February 6, 2023, Turkey Earthquake

El-Kelani,

Atatri

2024

An-Najah University Journal for Research - A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The February 6, 2023, Turkey earthquake with a moment magnitude (Mw=7.8) will be recognized as one of the most powerful earthquakes to strike a large metropolitan area in recent memory. This quake occurred in southern Turkey near the northern border of Syria along the southern western branch of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF). This major event was followed by numerous significant aftershocks, with 14,107 earthquakes occurring as of March 5, 2023. Preliminary data analysis in this study of aftershocks a month after the main earthquake (Mw=7.8) indicates that the majority of the aftershock sequence concentrated near the epicenter of the main shock displaced numerous fault segments within the EAF zone and can have indirect effects on neighboring fault systems. As a result, notable earthquake activity was observed along the northern section of the Dead Sea Transform (DST) fault system in Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine. According to statistical seismological analysis, 81% of aftershocks with magnitudes less than 3 occurred after the main shock, while 38 aftershocks with magnitudes 5 or greater occurred within the first 6 days, that includes 7.5 and 6.8 magnitude shocks. The depth distribution of the large main shocks and the aftershocks was located at shallower crustal depth. The aftershock sequence is mostly distributed in the first 15 km of the earth's crust, with significant occurrences occurring between 5 and 19 km deep. The expected aftershock scenario of such a large earthquake is to continue for several months or longer, possibly years. The interaction of the EAF and the DST fault is a significant topic for study since it may well provide insights into the general tectonic activity and assist in better predicting future earthquakes in the region

show abstract

The strong ground motion and structural response analysis of 06 February 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and 7.6): a Case study for Malatya-Türkiye, Eastern Anatolia

Bayrak,

Çelebi,

Kılıç

et al. 2024

Bull Earthquake Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tari̇hsel Depremleri̇n Yeni̇den Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇ne Örnek Bi̇r Çalişma: 1789 Palu (Elaziğ) Depremi̇, Doğu Anadolu, Türki̇ye

Abstract: The East

Cited by 9 publications

References 21 publications

2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Sonrası Malatya İlinde Yer Alan Yığma Binaların Hasar Mekanizmasının İncelenmesi

2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Sonrası Malatya İlinde Yer Alan Yığma Binaların Hasar Mekanizmasının İncelenmesi

Preliminary Analysis of the Aftershock Sequence of the February 6, 2023, Turkey Earthquake

The strong ground motion and structural response analysis of 06 February 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and 7.6): a Case study for Malatya-Türkiye, Eastern Anatolia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About