2017
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aa85eb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TASEP of interacting particles of arbitrary size

Abstract: A mean-field description of the stationary state behaviour of interacting k-mers performing totally asymmetric exclusion processes (TASEP) on an open lattice segment is presented employing the discrete Takahashi formalism. It is shown how the maximal current and the phase diagram, including triple-points, depend on the strength of repulsive and attractive interactions. We compare the mean-field results with Monte Carlo simulation of three types interacting k-mers: monomers, dimers and trimers. (a) We find that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. (38) This equation can be solved to evaluate the density in the HD phase as a function of the exit rate β for any values of the parameters l, θ and E. When oligomers strongly repel each other (E → −∞), it can be shown that…”
Section: Ld Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. (38) This equation can be solved to evaluate the density in the HD phase as a function of the exit rate β for any values of the parameters l, θ and E. When oligomers strongly repel each other (E → −∞), it can be shown that…”
Section: Ld Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] and refs. therein), various PAs have been recently employed with success [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] in the study of several models in the KLS class and their generalizations. It is therefore worth investigating how a PA performs in the case of the AS model, and applying it to the study of properties of this model for which an exact solution is not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another class of exclusion models with 'sticky' particles [51,52] and with sticky rods [53] have been reported in the literature. 'Stickiness' in these models arise from the attractive interaction among the particles and rods.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in refs. [51][52][53] particles in a cluster retain their distinct identity and hop independently although the rates of their hop depend whether or not they are part of a cluster before or after the hop. In contrast, particles and rods lose their distinct identify upon fusion with another particle or rod; the resulting rod emerges with a new identity and hops as a single object.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%