2000
DOI: 10.1177/1368430200003004003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Adaptive Behavior and Performance in Groups

Abstract: The relationship of task adaptive behavior (TAB) to performance was studied in 31 computer supported groups using a simulated air traffic control task. Each person could access information on specific plane parameters. Based on messages from two specialists, the commanders assigned threat levels to planes that moved in the airspace. Groups worked on two different days. Shifts 1 to 3 (Day 1) and 4 to 6 (Day 2) were compared. Based on a hierarchical task analysis, measures of TAB were developed to assess conform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 However, our observation that lower performing crews spent a larger proportion of time on task management, specifically on task distribution (Table 5), partly contradicts research on trauma team performance that showed that a lack of explicit coordination (especially in directions and task delegation) frequently lead to coordination breakdowns during nonroutine situations. 9 This contradiction points to a critical area of team research: the optimal balance between time spent on coordination and time spent on task-related activities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…23,24 However, our observation that lower performing crews spent a larger proportion of time on task management, specifically on task distribution (Table 5), partly contradicts research on trauma team performance that showed that a lack of explicit coordination (especially in directions and task delegation) frequently lead to coordination breakdowns during nonroutine situations. 9 This contradiction points to a critical area of team research: the optimal balance between time spent on coordination and time spent on task-related activities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In the workplace growth is captured in such things as improvements in interpersonal communication, more proficient decision processes and enhancements in core features of leadership including knowledge and creative vision. Each of these concepts illustrate growth because they are widely viewed as being essential to the effective performance of groups like work teams and organizations (Bonner, Baumann, & Dalal, 2002; Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993; Ganster, Williams, & Poppler, 1991; Tschan, Norbert, Nagele, & Gurtner, 2000). Similarly in families, growth is captured in concepts like flexibility or the ability to assign and reassign internal roles, communication and problem solving which are viewed as key aspects of optimal family functioning (Beavers & Hampson, 1993; Epstein, Bishop, Ryan, Miller, & Keitner, 1993; Olson, 1993; Pratt, 1976).…”
Section: The Process Of Work‐family Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1995),Cooper & Wakelam (1999),Flood et al (2000),Higgins & Routhieaux (1999),Keller (1992) Kim et al (1999), Norrgen & Schaller (1999,Nealey & Blood (1968),Oh et al (1991),Spangler & Braiotta (1990),Stoker & Remdisch (1997),Taggar & Seijts (2003),Thamhain (2004),Tschan et al (2000), andWatson et al (2002). c Wageman(2001),Stoker et al (2001), andMichaelsen (1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…,Cooper & Wakelam, (1999),Flood et al (2000),Higgins & Routhieaux (1999),Keller (2001),Kim, Min, & Cha (1999),Kline (2003),Kolb (1992),Michaelsen (1973),Nealey & Blood (1968), Norrgen & Schaller (1999,Oh, Kim, & Lee (1991),Spangler & Braiotta (1990),Stoker & Remdisch (1997), Stoker, Looise, Fisscher, & deJong (2001,Taggar & Seijts (2003),Thamhain (2004),Tschan, Semmer, Nagele, & Gurtner (2000),and Watson, Johnson, & Zgourides (2002).bBird (1977),,Kane et al (2002),Keller (1992), andKomaki, Desselles, & Bowman (1989). cBrewer, Wilson, & Beck (1994),Burpitt & Bigoness (1997),Edmondson (1999),Edmondson (2003),Flood et al (2000),Gordon & Brannick (1999),Hirst, Mann, Bain, Pirola-Merlo, & Richver (2004),Keller (1992),Kim et al (1999),Kirkman & Rosen (1999),Kline (2003),Kolb (1992), Lim & Ployhart (2004), McDonough & Pearson (1993), Michaelsen (1973), Nealey & Blood (1968), Norrgen & Schaller (1999), Odusami, Iyagba, & Omirin (2003), Pearce & Herbik (2004), Pearce & Sims (2002), Pirola-Merlo, Hartel, Mann, & Hirst (2002),Pratt & Jiambalvo (1981),Sivasubramaniam et al (2002),Smith et al (1994),Smith-Jentsch, Salas, & Brannick (2001);Sosik (1997),,Sosik, Kahai, & Avolio (1998)…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%