2016
DOI: 10.1002/wcm.2689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task admission control policy in cloud server pools based on task arrival dynamics

Abstract: In this paper, we propose two task admission control algorithms that utilize random task filtering: a lightweight algorithm based on long-term estimates of average utilization and offered load, and a more complex algorithm based on instantaneous utilization. Detailed performance evaluation confirms that both algorithms are able to ensure that the system remains in the stable operating region. We have also found that more aggressive filtering tends to decrease task blocking rate and delay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper proposes an admission control and scheduling mechanism that rejects the task if it cannot be completed within the deadline [if the deadline is hard] and budget or if the SaaS provider is not going to earn any profit [if the deadline is soft]. Khojasteh et al [15] presented two algorithms for task admission control by incorporating a filtering coefficient and a full-rate task acceptance threshold value. In 1st algorithm, they calculated the estimated average utilization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes an admission control and scheduling mechanism that rejects the task if it cannot be completed within the deadline [if the deadline is hard] and budget or if the SaaS provider is not going to earn any profit [if the deadline is soft]. Khojasteh et al [15] presented two algorithms for task admission control by incorporating a filtering coefficient and a full-rate task acceptance threshold value. In 1st algorithm, they calculated the estimated average utilization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%