2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task alternation cost without task alternation: Measuring intentionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One half of this double dissociation is provided in the current results, showing that some manipulations produced dramatic influences on the RT-TRCE while not affecting the PE-TRCE. The second half of the double dissociation is afforded by Yehene et al (2005), who studied the neurological patient AF. When compared with controls, this patient exhibited drastically enlarged PE-TRCE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One half of this double dissociation is provided in the current results, showing that some manipulations produced dramatic influences on the RT-TRCE while not affecting the PE-TRCE. The second half of the double dissociation is afforded by Yehene et al (2005), who studied the neurological patient AF. When compared with controls, this patient exhibited drastically enlarged PE-TRCE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs have also been shown to activate different brain regions (Braver et al, 2003) and to be differentially affected by experimental manipulations (e.g., Steinhauser & Hü bner, 2005). Additionally, mixing cost is present even without task switching (Yehene, Meiran, & Soroker, 2005), whereas switching cost seems to depend on actual switching (Schuch & Koch, 2003).…”
Section: Indices Of Executive Functioning In the Task Switching Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm is the same as that used by Yehene et al (2005). The stimuli were filled in gray color and were either a small/large circle (with a diameter subtending a visual angle of approximately 1.4°or 3.0°) or a small/large square (each side subtending 1.4°or 3.0°).…”
Section: Shape/size Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, congruency effects are increased in conditions where task switching does not involve (or involves less) suppression of the abandoned task set (Arbuthnott, 2005). Third, participants who anticipate a task switch (but do not execute such a switch) show RT congruency effects, whereas participants who do not expect a switch (and also do not switch) do not show these effects (Yehene, Meiran, & Soroker, 2005), suggesting that the source of conflict originates with configuring the appropriate task set rather than determining a particular response. Finally, using a computational model of task switching, Brown et al (2006) explicitly suggest that the conflict in incongruent trials is resolved by enhancing task-related representations.…”
Section: What Type Of Response Conflict Is Involved?mentioning
confidence: 98%