Task-based functional MRI challenges in clinical neuroscience: Choice of the best head motion correction approach in multiple sclerosis

Abstract

IntroductionFunctional MRI (fMRI) is commonly used for understanding brain organization and connectivity abnormalities in neurological conditions, and in particular in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, head motion degrades fMRI data quality and influences all image-derived metrics. Persistent controversies regarding the best correction strategy motivates a systematic comparison, including methods such as scrubbing and volume interpolation, to find optimal correction models, particularly in studies with clinical populations prone to characterize by high motion. Moreover, strategies for correction of motion effects gain more relevance in task-based designs, which are less explored compared to resting-state, have usually lower sample sizes, and may have a crucial role in describing the functioning of the brain and highlighting specific connectivity changes.MethodsWe acquired fMRI data from 17 early MS patients and 14 matched healthy controls (HC) during performance of a visual task, characterized motion in both groups, and quantitatively compared the most used and easy to implement methods for correction of motion effects. We compared task-activation metrics obtained from: (i) models containing 6 or 24 motion parameters (MPs) as nuisance regressors; (ii) models containing nuisance regressors for 6 or 24 MPs and motion outliers (scrubbing) detected with Framewise Displacement or Derivative or root mean square VARiance over voxelS; and (iii) models with 6 or 24 MPs and motion outliers corrected through volume interpolation. To our knowledge, volume interpolation has not been systematically compared with scrubbing, nor investigated in task fMRI clinical studies in MS.ResultsNo differences in motion were found between groups, suggesting that recently diagnosed MS patients may not present problematic motion. In general, models with 6 MPs perform better than models with 24 MPs, suggesting the 6 MPs as the best trade-off between correction of motion effects and preservation of valuable information. Parsimonious models with 6 MPs and volume interpolation were the best combination for correcting motion in both groups, surpassing the scrubbing methods. A joint analysis regardless of the group further highlighted the value of volume interpolation.DiscussionVolume interpolation of motion outliers is an easy to implement technique, which may be an alternative to other methods and may improve the accuracy of fMRI analyses, crucially in clinical studies in MS and other neurological populations.

Proprioceptive and tactile processing in individuals with Friedreich ataxia: an fMRI study

“…For each patient, we constructed one GLM for each condition that included the preprocessed fMRI data in which the experimental conditions (i.e., tactile oddball stimulation vs. rest) were modelled as boxcar functions convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function. The GLMs also included, as co-variates of no interest, the corresponding six motion parameters obtained from realignment ( 27 , 34 , 35 ). First-level (within patients) statistical T maps were then created to identify significant increases in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal between stimulation paradigms vs. rest conditions (positive BOLD response, PBR), as well as decreases (negative BOLD responses, NBRs) in the tactile oddball paradigm.…”