Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2005.578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Performance Under Deceptive Conditions: Using Military Scenarios in Deception Detection Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reason for exclusion Akehurst, Bull, Vrij, and Köhnken (2004) Lack of statistical data for computing an effect size Biros (2004) Review of Biros et al (2002) and Cao et al (2003) Biros, George, andZmud (2002) Task for judges was to find error in complex working situations instead of statements Biros, George, and Zmud (2005) Summary of Biros et al (2002) with implications Biros, Hass, Wiers, Twitchell, Adkins, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) No deception detection training study Biros, Sakamoto, Geroge, Adkins, Kruse, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) Cue knowledge score investigated (pop-up quizzes; no detection accuracy) Blair, Levine, and Shaw (2010) Participants received additional information about the context/situation, but were not trained Burgoon, Nunamaker, George, Adkins, Kruse, and Biros (2007) Grant report that includes two training studies (George, Marett, et al, 2004, and, which are both included) Cao, Crews, Lin, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2003) Same data set as Crews, Cao, Lin, Nunamaker, and Burgoon (2007) (continued) Zuckerman, Koestner, and Colella (1985) publ.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reason for exclusion Akehurst, Bull, Vrij, and Köhnken (2004) Lack of statistical data for computing an effect size Biros (2004) Review of Biros et al (2002) and Cao et al (2003) Biros, George, andZmud (2002) Task for judges was to find error in complex working situations instead of statements Biros, George, and Zmud (2005) Summary of Biros et al (2002) with implications Biros, Hass, Wiers, Twitchell, Adkins, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) No deception detection training study Biros, Sakamoto, Geroge, Adkins, Kruse, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) Cue knowledge score investigated (pop-up quizzes; no detection accuracy) Blair, Levine, and Shaw (2010) Participants received additional information about the context/situation, but were not trained Burgoon, Nunamaker, George, Adkins, Kruse, and Biros (2007) Grant report that includes two training studies (George, Marett, et al, 2004, and, which are both included) Cao, Crews, Lin, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2003) Same data set as Crews, Cao, Lin, Nunamaker, and Burgoon (2007) (continued) Zuckerman, Koestner, and Colella (1985) publ.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The game was designed to research and teach group interactions, dynamics, and processes. The game was developed in order to investigate deception detection within large groups of people (Biros et al, 2005), by examining group performance and perceptions of deception in face-to-face communications and real-time text chat (Biros et al, 2005). The two forms of communication are manipulated to make participants more suspicious of one another, according to scenarios taken from practice and developed through StrikeCOM.…”
Section: Mmorpgs For Military Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full Spectrum Command ( FSC ) is a more immersive and visually absorbing style of MMORPG and was developed as an educational tool (Biros et al , 2005). Drawing upon the real‐time strategy game genre, FSC aims to teach cognitive skills, such as leadership and decision‐making skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These missions include extensive background stories, including a detailed history of the current situation and enemy personalities (with fictional images and profiles). As the learner advances through the missions, the stories become more complex, with greater surprises and twists designed to put the student under greater pressure, thereby testing their abilities to keep calm under increasing pressure (Biros et al , 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%