“…Reason for exclusion Akehurst, Bull, Vrij, and Köhnken (2004) Lack of statistical data for computing an effect size Biros (2004) Review of Biros et al (2002) and Cao et al (2003) Biros, George, andZmud (2002) Task for judges was to find error in complex working situations instead of statements Biros, George, and Zmud (2005) Summary of Biros et al (2002) with implications Biros, Hass, Wiers, Twitchell, Adkins, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) No deception detection training study Biros, Sakamoto, Geroge, Adkins, Kruse, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2005) Cue knowledge score investigated (pop-up quizzes; no detection accuracy) Blair, Levine, and Shaw (2010) Participants received additional information about the context/situation, but were not trained Burgoon, Nunamaker, George, Adkins, Kruse, and Biros (2007) Grant report that includes two training studies (George, Marett, et al, 2004, and, which are both included) Cao, Crews, Lin, Burgoon, and Nunamaker (2003) Same data set as Crews, Cao, Lin, Nunamaker, and Burgoon (2007) (continued) Zuckerman, Koestner, and Colella (1985) publ.…”