2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.022824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Scheduling Optimization in Cloud Computing by Rao Algorithm

Abstract: Cloud computing is currently dominated within the space of highperformance distributed computing and it provides resource polling and ondemand services through the web. So, task scheduling problem becomes a very important analysis space within the field of a cloud computing environment as a result of user's services demand modification dynamically. The main purpose of task scheduling is to assign tasks to available processors to produce minimum schedule length without violating precedence restrictions. In hete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technique Used Addressed Parameters [7] APSO Makespan, throughput [8] LJ-PSO, M-PSO makespan, total execution time, degree of imbalance [9] GAGELS makespan, resource utilization [10] MPSO Makespan, resource utilization [11] IT2FCM Data movements, data placement, makespan [12] PSO-RDAL Response time, task deadline, penalty cost [13] EPSOCHO Makespan, processing cost, resource utilization [14] GSOS Makespan, cost [15] AINN-BPSO makespan, cost, degree of imbalance [16] QPSO Scheduling efficiency [17] MVO-GA Task transfer time [18] NSGAIII runtime, cost, power consumption [19] Hybrid Lion-GA Load balancing [20] GSAGA Makespan [21] GBO Makespan, accuracy of scheduling [22] HWOA-MBA Makespan, cost [23] IWHOLF-TSC Makespan, cost [24] HWACOA Makespan, cost ELHHO Schedule length, execution cost, resource utilization [28] RATSA Failure rate [29] SOATS Cost, energy consumption [30] HunterPlus Energy consumption, job completion rate [31] IQSSA QOS parameters [32] RAO Makespan [33] HFSGA Makespan, cost [34] DRL Makespan, throughput [35] IMOMVO Execution time, throughput [36] HBSFD Task processing time, turnaround time [37] Wale Disk space [38] Docker Containers Disk space…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technique Used Addressed Parameters [7] APSO Makespan, throughput [8] LJ-PSO, M-PSO makespan, total execution time, degree of imbalance [9] GAGELS makespan, resource utilization [10] MPSO Makespan, resource utilization [11] IT2FCM Data movements, data placement, makespan [12] PSO-RDAL Response time, task deadline, penalty cost [13] EPSOCHO Makespan, processing cost, resource utilization [14] GSOS Makespan, cost [15] AINN-BPSO makespan, cost, degree of imbalance [16] QPSO Scheduling efficiency [17] MVO-GA Task transfer time [18] NSGAIII runtime, cost, power consumption [19] Hybrid Lion-GA Load balancing [20] GSAGA Makespan [21] GBO Makespan, accuracy of scheduling [22] HWOA-MBA Makespan, cost [23] IWHOLF-TSC Makespan, cost [24] HWACOA Makespan, cost ELHHO Schedule length, execution cost, resource utilization [28] RATSA Failure rate [29] SOATS Cost, energy consumption [30] HunterPlus Energy consumption, job completion rate [31] IQSSA QOS parameters [32] RAO Makespan [33] HFSGA Makespan, cost [34] DRL Makespan, throughput [35] IMOMVO Execution time, throughput [36] HBSFD Task processing time, turnaround time [37] Wale Disk space [38] Docker Containers Disk space…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method minimizes user payment costs and task scheduling time. Youne et al [10] set priorities for tasks and use the proposed RAO algorithm to find execution time optimal solutions for tasks based on user demand scheduling policies. Tong et al [11] provided an efficient scheduling solution by exploiting the adaptive learning capability of the dual-depth Q-network to shorten the response time while guaranteeing task completion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%