Task sharing in an interprofessional medication management program – a survey of general practitioners and community pharmacists

Abstract

Background Pharmacist-led medication review and medication management programs (MMP) are well-known strategies to improve medication safety and effectiveness. If performed interprofessionally, outcomes might even improve. However, little is known about task sharing in interprofessional MMP, in which general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) collaboratively perform medication reviews and continuously follow-up on patients with designated medical and pharmaceutical tasks, respectively. In 2016, ARMIN (Arzneimittelinitiative Sachsen-Thüringen) an interprofessional MMP was launched in two German federal states, Saxony and Thuringia. The aim of this study was to understand how GPs and CPs share tasks in MMP when reviewing the patients’ medication. Methods This was a cross-sectional postal survey among GPs and CPs who participated in the MMP. Participants were asked who completed which MMP tasks, e.g., checking drug-drug interactions, dosing, and side effects. In total, 15 MMP tasks were surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “I complete this task alone” to “GP/CP completes this task alone”. The study was conducted between 11/2020 and 04/2021. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results In total, 114/165 (69.1%) GPs and 166/243 (68.3%) CPs returned a questionnaire. The majority of GPs and CPs reported (i) checking clinical parameters and medication overuse and underuse to be completed by GPs, (ii) checking storage conditions of drugs and initial compilation of the patient’s medication including brown bag review being mostly performed by CPs, and (iii) checking side-effects, non-adherence, and continuous updating of the medication list were carried out jointly. The responses differed most for problems with self-medication and adding and removing over-the-counter medicines from the medication list. In addition, the responses revealed that some MMP tasks were not sufficiently performed by either GPs or CPs. Conclusions Both GPs’ and CPs’ expertise are needed to perform MMP as comprehensively as possible. Future studies should explore how GPs and CPs can complement each other in MMP most efficiently.

Potentially inappropriate medication including drug-drug interaction and the risk of frequent falling, hospital admission, and death in older adults - results of a large cohort study (getABI)

“…In addition, the PRISCUS list has been adopted in most major electronic prescribing tools in Germany. As interdisciplinary teams involving clinical pharmacists, some of them specialised in geriatric pharmacy, are getting more and more into practice, this may also contribute to safer prescribing ( Moecker et al, 2022 ).…”

Are pharmacists on the front lines of the opioid epidemic? A cross-sectional study of the practices and competencies of community and hospital pharmacists in Punjab, Pakistan

“…Ensuring appropriate opioid use requires devising a mechanism or channel of communication between the prescriber and pharmacist, especially in a community setting in Pakistan. Numerous studies provide evidence for the positive outcomes of collaborative care on medication reviews, identifying prescribing errors and intervening in opioid misuse in other countries 33 34. Similarly, only a handful of respondents reported that they notified the police or regulatory bodies regarding the abuse of opioids, highlighting a potential lack of awareness or reluctance to report such cases.…”

Clinical pharmacy services are reimbursed in Germany: challenges of real world implementation remain

“…Continuously analyzing the claims data will provide robust data on the scale of the use. From the viewpoint of research, CPS applied in a real world mandate to investigate at least (a) the sustainability of implementation, exploring enablers and barriers, including workforce issues and (b) the added value of these remunerated services [ 7 , 14 , 22 , 36 – 38 ]. The findings may also inform the development and implementation of CPS in other healthcare systems.…”

“…Integrating an electronic data transfer between GPs and CPs into the local software facilitated implementation [ 6 ]. The evaluation revealed that GPs and CPs shared most of the tasks in the MMP, as envisaged in the original concept, and many of their tasks complemented each other [ 7 ]. The evaluation of the primary outcomes of this MMP has been submitted for publication, recently.…”