1997
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task-Specific Sex Differences in Vigilance Performance: Subjective Workload and Boredom

Abstract: Participants (24 men, 24 women) were asked to perform either a spatial or temporal vigilance task. Task-related Boredom and NASA-Task Load Index scores were collected. The results replicate Dittmar, Warm, Dember, and Ricks' 1993 finding of task-specific sex differences in vigilance performance and subjective workload. The present study also showed task-specific sex differences for boredom ratings. These results suggest that two explanations may account for the sex differences. More accurate perceptual discrimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,22 In addition, the significant poorer vigilance performance in women, compared with men, seen in our results has been shown in prior studies. 23,24 The reasons for the sex differences in PVT response speed are not likely to reflect aptitude differences 24,25 as much as differences between men and women in response bias-men tend to bias toward speed whereas women tend to bias toward accuracy, which is consistent with our finding that men had significantly shorter RTs overall, but they also averaged a higher number of false responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…15,22 In addition, the significant poorer vigilance performance in women, compared with men, seen in our results has been shown in prior studies. 23,24 The reasons for the sex differences in PVT response speed are not likely to reflect aptitude differences 24,25 as much as differences between men and women in response bias-men tend to bias toward speed whereas women tend to bias toward accuracy, which is consistent with our finding that men had significantly shorter RTs overall, but they also averaged a higher number of false responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is consistent with numerous other studies that have failed to find gender differences on CPTs using alphanumeric stimuli (Edley & Knopf, 1987;Lam & Beale, 1991;McKay, Halperin, Schwartz, & Sharma, 1994;Swanson & Cooney, 1989). Studies of adolescents and young adults, however, suggest that the likelihood of genderrelated variation in CPT performance may be controlled by level of demand for visual-spatial (i.e., non-verbal) analysis of stimuli (Dittmar et al, 1993;Lin et al, 1999;Prinzel & Freeman, 1997). This issue has not been examined systematically among children.…”
Section: Relationships Of Subject Attributes To Cpt Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent investigations of CPT scores obtained by adolescents and young adults suggest that the likelihood of gender differences on CPTs is controlled by the visual complexity of stimuli (Dittmar, Warm, Dember, & Ricks, 1993;Prinzel & Freeman, 1997). A recent study suggests that task complexity may moderate the likelihood of gender differences on auditory CPTs among children (Hatta, 1993).…”
Section: Gender and Cpt Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings are consistent with previous research on sex differences in boredom proneness (see, e.g., Prinzel & Freeman, 1997 interest, however, is that men scored higher than women. This finding, although unexpected, is in keeping with previous research on the relationship between boredom and the academic performance of some male undergraduates (e.g., Maroldo, 1986).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…It has, for example, been associated with negative affective states (Farmer & Sundberg, 1986), pathological gambling (Blaszczynsh, McConaghy, & Frankova, 1990), poor academic performance (Maroldo, 1986), and a variety of health problems (Sommers & Vodanovich, 2000). Of particular interest is research involving sex differences in boredom proneness wherein findings have consistently shown a tendency for females to report higher scores on boredom than males (Farmer & Sundberg, 1986;Prinzel & Freeman, 1997). The present study attempted to examine further the issue of sex differences in boredom proneness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%