1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2345(1999)48:2<153::aid-ajp6>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taste difference thresholds for sucrose in two species of nonhuman primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The taste preference difference thresholds of the chimpanzees for sucrose found in the present study are in the same range as those reported in squirrel monkeys, but higher than those in spider monkeys and olive baboons (Table 3). This finding is somewhat unexpected, as some studies suggest that the ability to distinguish between different concentrations of sweet-tasting food constituents should correlate positively with the degree of frugivory (Laska et al 1999a, b). Spider monkeys, for example, are clearly more frugivorous than squirrel monkeys and Ateles geoffroyi also displays lower Weber ratios, that is, a higher ability to discriminate between sucrose concentrations than Saimiri sciureus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The taste preference difference thresholds of the chimpanzees for sucrose found in the present study are in the same range as those reported in squirrel monkeys, but higher than those in spider monkeys and olive baboons (Table 3). This finding is somewhat unexpected, as some studies suggest that the ability to distinguish between different concentrations of sweet-tasting food constituents should correlate positively with the degree of frugivory (Laska et al 1999a, b). Spider monkeys, for example, are clearly more frugivorous than squirrel monkeys and Ateles geoffroyi also displays lower Weber ratios, that is, a higher ability to discriminate between sucrose concentrations than Saimiri sciureus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1] present study; [2] van Gemert (2011); [3] Simmen and Charlot (2003); [4] Laska (2000); [5] Glaser (1986); [6] Sunderland and Sclafani (1988); [7] Nishi et al (2016); [8] Laska et al (1999a, b); [9] Laska et al (1996); [10] Laska (1996); [11] Simmen and Hladik (1998); [12] Simmen (1994); [13] Wielbass et al (2015); [14] Simmen et al (1999)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations