Tatangan dan Isu Strategis Gerakan Antikorupsi Terkini

Abstract

The challenge faced by the Indonesian nation against the anti-corruption movement is the weakening of law enforcement agencies, especially the Corruption Eradication Commission in preventing and cracking down on corruption crimes such as the composition of the commission of investigators, investigators and public prosecutors, which comes from the police and prosecutors. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that cause corruption, examine the challenges and strategic issues faced by the Indonesian nation in the anti-corruption movement and review the efforts that must be made by the government so that the challenges and issues of the anti-corruption movement can be resolved. The research method used is normative legal research by reviewing and researching laws and regulations. The results of the analysis concluded that the acts of corruption committed were caused by several factors. There are derived from internal factors such as greedy or greedy nature, other factors are consumptive lifestyle, less powerful moral factors. While the second factor is external factors such as politics, legal factors, economic factors. These issues are a challenge and a strategic issue faced by the Indonesian nation in the anti-corruption movement. The existence of a Corruption Eradication Commission institution formed at the time of reform is considered less than optimal in terms of prevention. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was formed because conventional legal institutions are less than optimal in terms of prevention and enforcement of corruption. Efforts that must be made by the government so that the challenges and issues of the anti-corruption movement can be resolved is to declare that corruption is an enemy of the Indonesian nation.

A Science Education for Textural Creation and Iconic Forms of Infrastructure at Medan

“…In general, the understanding of iconicity is discussed and understood in the discipline of semiotics, which deals with the relationship of signs (Ibrahim & Sulaiman, 2020). It can be understood that iconic forms are forms that image or represent the character of certain objects (Budiman, 2012). Based on this understanding, the iconic form certainly characterises the identity of the character it represents (Brilmyer, 2022;Imaduddin et al, 2020).…”