2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c08211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taurine Electrografting onto Porous Electrodes Improves Redox Flow Battery Performance

Abstract: The surface properties of porous carbonaceous electrodes govern the performance, durability, and ultimately the cost of redox flow batteries (RFBs). State-of-the-art carbon fiber-based electrode interfaces suffer from limited kinetic activity and incomplete wettability, fundamentally limiting the performance. Surface treatments for electrodes such as thermal and acid activation are a common practice to make them more suitable for aqueous RFBs; however, these treatments offer limited control over the desired fu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the proposed method is effective in manufacturing conductive structures, the use of costly coatings (such as Ag and Pt) is incompatible with large scale manufacturing. Our goal is to demonstrate the potential of these novel flow field geometries, and future work should be devoted to the development of coatings with lower electronic resistivity or readily conductive resins, which are cost effective. , We acknowledge that the kinetic rate constant of the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox reaction on the surface of the platinum coating might be different compared with that on the carbon electrode surfaces. However, we do not anticipate the Pt coating to largely change the overall performance since the redox reaction is an outer sphere, and kinetic rate constants in the literature do not differ significantly. Furthermore, the area of the carbonaceous porous electrode is significantly larger than the area of the flow field coated with platinum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the proposed method is effective in manufacturing conductive structures, the use of costly coatings (such as Ag and Pt) is incompatible with large scale manufacturing. Our goal is to demonstrate the potential of these novel flow field geometries, and future work should be devoted to the development of coatings with lower electronic resistivity or readily conductive resins, which are cost effective. , We acknowledge that the kinetic rate constant of the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox reaction on the surface of the platinum coating might be different compared with that on the carbon electrode surfaces. However, we do not anticipate the Pt coating to largely change the overall performance since the redox reaction is an outer sphere, and kinetic rate constants in the literature do not differ significantly. Furthermore, the area of the carbonaceous porous electrode is significantly larger than the area of the flow field coated with platinum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutron CT has been employed in previous studies to investigate water production and removal in fuel cells, water/ice formation during subzero operating conditions, 97 and the distribution of water in flow channels of fuel cell stacks. 98 Figure 10 shows a typical neutron CT study 99 on redox flow battery electrode and electrolyte, with data acquired at Swiss Spallation Neutron Source. The carbon felt cathodes and anodes with different treatments were separated by thick PTFE membrane and injected with mixture electrolytes of ferrous chloride and ferric chloride.…”
Section: Iibii X-ray Ct With Neutron Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bottom) The corresponding plot of water thickness/velocity versus time. [Reprinted from ref . Open access under Creative Commons CC BY license.…”
Section: Why We Need X-ray Ct In Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in activation overpotential is however dependent on the redox chemistry used. Electrolytes featuring sluggish kinetics, such as vanadium (reaction rate constant � 10 À 6 cm s À 1 in H 2 SO 4 [89] ), benefit more of an increased internal surface area compared to kinetically facile electrolytes such as Fe 2 + /Fe 3 + electrolytes (reaction rate constant � 10 À 3 cm s À 1 in HCl and with thermally treated carbon electrodes [90] ) because of the high exchange current density. Furthermore, the mass transfer overpotential is decreased upon electrode stacking as a result of evaluating at a constant electrolyte velocity, resulting in higher mass flow rates and thus enhanced reactant supply for thicker electrodes.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%