2007
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.60508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taurocholic Acid Does Not Induce Apoptosis in HCT116 Cells Regardless of Its Intracellular Concentration

Abstract: Hydrophobic bile acids but not hydrophilic bile acids induce apoptosis in HCT116 cells. We expressed sodium-dependent bile acid transporters in HCT116 cells, and the intracellular concentration of hydrophilic bile acids increased to that of the hydrophobic bile acids. But no sign of apoptosis was observed, which suggests a hydrophobic-bile acid-specific mechanism for the induction of apoptosis in HCT116 cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rat hepatocytes, glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDC) induces apoptosis via ligand-independent Fas oligomerization (1,2). In contrast, GCDC is not responsible for apoptosis in human colon cancer-derived HCT116 cells (3). In hepatocytes, apoptosis by the hydrophobic secondary bile acid, deoxycholic acid (DC), requires expression and aggregation of death receptor 5 (DR5), also designated as tumor necrosis factor-related, apoptosisinducing ligand-receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2) (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rat hepatocytes, glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDC) induces apoptosis via ligand-independent Fas oligomerization (1,2). In contrast, GCDC is not responsible for apoptosis in human colon cancer-derived HCT116 cells (3). In hepatocytes, apoptosis by the hydrophobic secondary bile acid, deoxycholic acid (DC), requires expression and aggregation of death receptor 5 (DR5), also designated as tumor necrosis factor-related, apoptosisinducing ligand-receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2) (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%