1988
DOI: 10.1177/088541228800300305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Abatements—Revenue or Expense?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Peckol (1988) and Sands, Reese, and Khan (2006), we identified six factors that county board members may consider when deciding to grant tax abatements. We asked the citizen and board member respondents to rate the importance of each factor in the tax abatement granting decision.…”
Section: Survey Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on Peckol (1988) and Sands, Reese, and Khan (2006), we identified six factors that county board members may consider when deciding to grant tax abatements. We asked the citizen and board member respondents to rate the importance of each factor in the tax abatement granting decision.…”
Section: Survey Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not pre-screen the analysts and the preparers because the nature of their work requires familiarity with financial reporting. Drawing upon suggestions from Gamkhar and Granof (2008), Kavanagh and Riordan (2008), LeRoy (2004), and Peckol (1988) and considering the sections in a government's audited financial report, we identified the following options for reporting tax abatements and asked respondents to choose only one:…”
Section: Survey Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%