2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2585801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Avoidance in Response to a Decline in the Funding Status of Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Richardson, Taylor, and Lanis (2015) documented positive association between financial distress and corporate tax avoidance, signifying that there would be higher incentives to avoid tax during times of financial crisis. Chaudhry, Yong, and Veld (2016) found that fi rms would engage more in tax avoidance when there was a decline in the funding status of pension plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richardson, Taylor, and Lanis (2015) documented positive association between financial distress and corporate tax avoidance, signifying that there would be higher incentives to avoid tax during times of financial crisis. Chaudhry, Yong, and Veld (2016) found that fi rms would engage more in tax avoidance when there was a decline in the funding status of pension plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() attribute this reduction in investment to a higher cost of capital that increases as MPC increase. Another strand of literature suggests that firms intentionally underfund their pension plans for various reasons such as to negotiate with employees (Ippolito, ; Benmelech et al., ), avoid takeovers (Asthana, ), and maximize tax benefits (Asthana, ; Shivdasani and Stefanescu, ; Chaudhry et al., ). Shivdasani and Stefanescu () and Cocco and Volpin () note that pension plan sponsoring firms in general are large and profitable with fewer growth opportunities than firms that do not sponsor such pension plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors examine the impact on firm risk (e.g., Anantharaman and Lee, 2014;Bennett, Guntay & Unal, 2015;Bekkum, 2016). Others investigate how corporate policies of US firms are also influenced by DB pension, for example dividend policy (e.g., Caliskan and Doukas, 2015;Eisdorfer, Giaccotto & White, 2015), cash holdings (Liu, Mauer & Zhang, 2014) and tax policy (e.g., Chi, Huang & Sanchez, 2017;Chaudhry, Yong & Veld, 2017). On the other hand, there is a dearth of studies analyzing the impact of DB pension on corporate policies and firm risk for non-US firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%