Tax competition, environmental regulation and high-quality economic development: An empirical test based on spatial Durbin model

Abstract

Studying economic development in China is a very important topic recently because China's economy is moving toward high-quality development and local governments face the dilemma of environmental governance and economic development. To contribute to the literature in this area further, this paper assesses the impact of tax competition and environmental regulation on high-quality economic development through the spatial Durbin model and instrumental variable and by using the data from 278 prefecture-level and above cities from 2007 to 2017 in China. Our empirical analysis shows that tax competition inhibits high-quality economic development and a positive spatial spillover effect, environmental regulation has a significant direct promoting effect on high-quality economic development and a negative spatial spillover effect, and local government tax competition inhibits the promotion effect of environmental regulation on high-quality economic development. Further heterogeneity analysis conducted in our study shows that both the direct and spatial spillover effects of tax competition and environmental regulation on high-quality economic development in large and medium-sized cities are significantly lower than those in small cities. Our empirical analysis infers that since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the promotion effect of environmental regulation on high-quality economic development and the synergistic effect with tax competition has become more and more significant. The findings in our paper are useful for both the central government and the local governments in making better decisions for economic development in China as well as in other countries.

The Heterogeneous Effects of Formal and Informal Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation—An Empirical Study of 284 Cities in China

“…Zhang et al [ 62 ] found that environmental regulations have different effects on GTI in China’s resource-based and non-resource-based cities. Shangguan et al [ 63 , 64 ] found that there is heterogeneity in the impact of environmental regulation on air pollution and high-quality economic development in large, medium, and small cities. It can be seen that the urban heterogeneity of the impact of environmental regulation is widespread.…”

Political incentives in market-based environmental regulation: Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading scheme

“…However, under a hierarchical administrative system in which the central government has authority, local officials who want to be promoted must work on the basis of the central government's preferences. Therefore, local governments will devote more administrative resources to measures that promote economic growth and disregard the regulation of environmental degradation when the central government sets a high priority on GDP targets [ 48 ]. Of course, the preferences of the central government are not static.…”

Research on Global Tax Governance under the Background of Digital Economy

“…At the same time, with the advent of the era of digital economy, the traditional forms of production organization have undergone drastic changes. The new elements of value creation have changed the way of cross-border transactions among countries, prompted the world economy to complete the transformation of old and new kinetic energy, and aggravated the imbalance of economic development among countries and the dilemma of the invalidation of traditional international tax rules (Appiah-Kubi et al, 2021;Shangguan et al, 2022;Ding et al, 2022). Specifically, with the deepening of multilateral cooperation and the successive implementation of BEPS action plans in various countries, the international tax governance order has entered the "post-BEPS era".…”