2021
DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax enforcement efforts and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Abstract: We propose that firms in regions with strong tax enforcement efforts have low stock price crash risk. Using a large sample of Chinese firms from 2003 to 2017, we find that tax enforcement efforts negatively affect future crash risk. This negative effect is stronger among state-owned companies but weaker when information opacity is higher for firms. These results are robust to alternative measures, additional controls, and additional analyses. We also show that tax avoidance and accounting conservatism are two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the perspective of implied volatility, they found that the restatement of financial reports, earnings management and internal control defects would increase the occurrence of stock price crash risks. Other scholars have conducted research from the perspective of external supervision, including tax regulation (Kim et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2022), media reports (An et al, 2020;Hossain et al, 2022), institutional investors (Xiang et al, 2020), and investor sentiment (Fu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the perspective of implied volatility, they found that the restatement of financial reports, earnings management and internal control defects would increase the occurrence of stock price crash risks. Other scholars have conducted research from the perspective of external supervision, including tax regulation (Kim et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2022), media reports (An et al, 2020;Hossain et al, 2022), institutional investors (Xiang et al, 2020), and investor sentiment (Fu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu & Zou, 2019), institutional investor (F. Li & Jiang, 2022), etc. The second is the external factor, includes tax (S. Chen et al, 2022), confucianism (Jebran, Chen, Ye, & Wang, 2019), geographical factors (X. Jin et al, 2022), etc.…”
Section: Environmental Regulation and Stock Price Crash Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on corporate governance mechanisms shows that board interlocking (Davis, 1991), CEO duality (Al Dah et al. , 2017; Chen et al. , 2021; Jebran et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on corporate governance mechanisms shows that board interlocking (Davis, 1991), CEO duality (Al Dah et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2021;Jebran et al, 2022), CEO tenure (Arikawa and Mitsusada, 2011), executive compensation plans (Azevedo et al, 2021;Heron and Lie, 2006), institutional ownership (Bhojraj et al, 2017;Davis, 1991;O. Harris and Madura, 2010) and the presence of staggered boards (Heron and Lie, 2015) are corporate governance drivers that positively influence the adoption of poison pills, whereas board size (Azevedo et al, 2021;Loh, 1994) and CEO/managerial ownership (Al Dah et al, 2017;Arikawa and Mitsusada, 2011;Lie, 2006, 2015) influence negatively.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Poison Pillsmentioning
confidence: 99%