2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.940505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Evasion and Ethics: A Demographic Study of 33 Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
26
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The marginal effects estimates of the bivariate probit model indicate that male ownership increases the propensity of tax payment relative to female ownership. These results on ownership and propensity to pay tax are consistent with the findings of some studies (McGee & Tyler, ; Antwi et al, ). In line with the findings of some studies in the literature (Yalama & Gumus, ; Akinaboade, and Antwi et al, ), the marginal effects estimation results for propensity to pay tax shows that having at least primary education increases the likelihood of paying tax.…”
Section: Estimation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The marginal effects estimates of the bivariate probit model indicate that male ownership increases the propensity of tax payment relative to female ownership. These results on ownership and propensity to pay tax are consistent with the findings of some studies (McGee & Tyler, ; Antwi et al, ). In line with the findings of some studies in the literature (Yalama & Gumus, ; Akinaboade, and Antwi et al, ), the marginal effects estimation results for propensity to pay tax shows that having at least primary education increases the likelihood of paying tax.…”
Section: Estimation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The effect of a low formal sector income on the perceived risk of detection is therefore likely to be ambiguous. Some of this ambiguity can be dispelled by a study on tax evasion and ethics by McGee and Tyler (2006).…”
Section: Econometric Analysis Of Perceived Risk Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that men, more so than women (the excluded modality), believe that it is less risky (because of the negative sign) to participate in the informal sector, given the estimated coefficient of -0.157 (significant at 5%) attached to the Male modality of the Sex attribute. This result is reinforced by McGee and Tyler (2006), who establish that men are more likely to evade taxes because men, more than women, think that tax evasion is not unacceptable. Business people living in sub-urban communities believe, more than their rural counterparts (reference modality) that there is a risk of detection.…”
Section: Econometric Analysis Of Perceived Risk Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tax evasion is a worldwide phenomenon. The problem is especially acute in transition and developing economies, since they do not have an appropriate infrastructure in place to collect taxes (McGee and Tyler, 2006). Tax evasion is widespread phenomenon and continues to be a problem for many countries (Tsakumis et al 2007;Nur-tegin, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%