1999
DOI: 10.2307/3551523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Havens: Investment Distortions and Policy Options

Abstract: Les différences dans les taxes sur le revenu des entreprises entre les nations créent des opportunités pour la minimisation des taxes en détournant le capital vers les juridictions ayant des taux de taxation moins élevés. De plus, l'opportunité d'utiliser un abri fiscal change le taux de retour relatif entre les investissements domestiques et étrangers. Les rapports financiers ne sont souvent pas suffisants pour informer les personnes, existantes ou potentielles, qui détiennent les enjeux en ce qui concerne le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this second-stage investment decision, we use a model developed by Mintz (2004) to obtain predictions that are empirically testable. The model 1 The Canadian Department of Finance explicitly referred to the so-called double dipping that is associated with indirect investments (for the Canadian discussion on double dips, see also Conklin and Robertson 1999; more details concerning the double dip strategy are provided in section 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this second-stage investment decision, we use a model developed by Mintz (2004) to obtain predictions that are empirically testable. The model 1 The Canadian Department of Finance explicitly referred to the so-called double dipping that is associated with indirect investments (for the Canadian discussion on double dips, see also Conklin and Robertson 1999; more details concerning the double dip strategy are provided in section 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The Canadian Department of Finance explicitly referred to the so‐called double dipping that is associated with indirect investments (for the Canadian discussion on double dips, see also Conklin and Robertson 1999; more details concerning the double dip strategy are provided in section 2). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table I) Employees may see jobs shifted to foreign countries as a result of inversions. Since companies will have an incentive to move jobs to non-U.S. or high tax area locations, more investment should take place in those areas as they will have a more favorable relative rate of return (Conklin and Robertson, 1999). This may lead to increased fear of job loss.…”
Section: Mill and Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%