2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2683551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Information Exchange with Developing Countries and Tax Havens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Appendix Table 9 presents the unilaterally determined standard WHT rates, Appendix Table 10 contains WHT rates indicated in bilateral tax treaties. In line with theoretical literature that highlights the importance of source taxation for capital-importing (developing) countries (Braun & Zagler, 2014;Daurer, 2014a), our descriptive statistics confirm that developing countries generally levy WHTs on more income categories and impose higher standard rates than developed countries. WHTs on technical and management fees are observed more frequently in developing countries.…”
Section: Tax Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…While Appendix Table 9 presents the unilaterally determined standard WHT rates, Appendix Table 10 contains WHT rates indicated in bilateral tax treaties. In line with theoretical literature that highlights the importance of source taxation for capital-importing (developing) countries (Braun & Zagler, 2014;Daurer, 2014a), our descriptive statistics confirm that developing countries generally levy WHTs on more income categories and impose higher standard rates than developed countries. WHTs on technical and management fees are observed more frequently in developing countries.…”
Section: Tax Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Rixen (2008) approached the topic of international cooperation and showed that information and investment asymmetry are the reason why states prefer bilateral negotiations. Braun and Zagler (2015) is one of the most comprehensive studies, analyzing double taxation conventions from an economic perspective in emerging countries, concluding that double taxation conventions are linked to variables such as geographical position, the size and degree of openness of the economy, political influences, and the level of state development.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barthel and Neumayer (2015) applied the spatial Cox proportional hazards model to a sample of 186 countries and demonstrated the probability to conclude a DTA increase in a competitional foreign environment. Braun and Zagler (2014) used conventional ordinary least square regressions (OLS) in the case of South Africa, Brazil, Colombia, and Uruguay to investigate the reasons of a developing country in concluding a DTA. The results showed that in case of developing countries have a huge importance in the geography of the country, the size of the economy, the openness of the country, as well as the colonial status and political similarities in concluding a DTA.…”
Section: Double Taxation Conventions Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The obvious answer is that they expect to be better off with them. These benefits 24 Braun and Zagler (2014) try to answer why developing countries agree on double tax treaties. They conclude that geography, economic size and openness matter.…”
Section: Conclusion -Summary Policy Suggestions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%