Tax Policy and Economic Growth: Lessons From the 1980s

Abstract

The past seven years of U.S. economic policy and performance constitute a truly remarkable, if confusing, experiment. Few would have guessed in 1980 that inflation would fall rapidly to 4 percent and hold pretty steady during a lengthy recovery; that productivity growth would partially rebound, the national debt more than double, capital imports reach $150 billion in a single year; or that employment would continue to expand at rates envied by other advanced economies. Perhaps fewer still would have predicted two major and two minor tax reforms would be passed in six years, a flip-flop in depreciation schedules, and a top personal tax rate below 30 percent. While it is always easier to draw inferences concerning economic growth, its determinants, and policies affecting the determinants with long historical hindsight, this paper will attempt to provide information, evaluation, and conjecture to draw some tentative lessons about the effects of tax policies in the 1980s on long-run economic growth.

Harmonizing Discretionary Policy Choice with Fiscal Rule Making: Mexico after Fiscal and Energy Sector Reforms

“…In both panels the vertical axis depicts the percentage change with respect to the benchmark conditions, while the horizontal axis presents household groups sorted in descendant order, from left to right, according to how they value their future utility. Figure 6.3.15 exhibits how changes in consumption taxes inuence households' investment decisions thorough leisure-rent choices 5 (Appendix D) across the new 139 steady-states. One more time, we have sorted household deciles in descendant order, from left to right, according to how they value their future utility.…”

“…The largest reductions are reported in the rst (−21.25%), third (−26.76%), fth (−15.82%), and sixth (−15.12%) deciles of population. Meanwhile, 5 Leisure-rent choices refers to the ratio between the net value of leisure to the sum of net labor income and government transfers: Chapter 7…”

“…May the Robust Decision Making (RDM) method be applied to problems of macroeconomic analysis and decision support when uncertainty prevails? What scal policies could exceed observed economic growth and income redistribution results from the scal and energy reforms under scenarios deep uncertainty 5 about future conditions?…”

“…http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/enchogares/regulares/enigh/nc/2012/default.html5 We dene deep uncertainty in terms of the Robust Decision Making framework, i.e., conditions in which the parties to a decision do not know or do not agree on the system model relating actions to consequences.…”

Effects of tax incentives on long-run capital formation and total factor productivity growth in the Canadian sawmilling industry

“…Assessing the effects of taxation policy instruments on annual flow of investment and technological progress is necessary for explaining the role of taxation in economic growth (Boskin, 1988). 1 To that effect, looking into the workings of the Keynesian macroeconomic model of aggregate demand management provides helpful insights.…”