Tax Policy to Reduce Carbon Emissions in a Distorted Economy: Illustrations from a South Africa CGE Model

Abstract

Noting that developing countries may not have the administrative capacity to levy a “pure” carbon tax, we compare the impact of alternative energy taxes with that of a carbon tax in an economy with multiple distortions. We use a disaggregated computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the South African economy and simulate a range of tax policies that reduce CO2 emissions by 15 percent. Consistent with a “first-best” economy, a carbon tax will have the lowest marginal cost of abatement. But the relationship between a tax on energy commodities and one on pollution-intensive commodities depends critically on other distortions in the system and on structural rigidities in the economy. We demonstrate that if South Africa were able to remove distortions in the labor market, the cost of carbon taxation would be negligible. We conclude that the welfare costs of taxing carbon emissions in developing countries depend more on other distortions than on the country’s own carbon emissions.

Climate and southern Africa's water–energy–food nexus

“…A high proportion of SADC greenhouse gas emissions are from South Africa due especially to its reliance on coal-fired power. Curbing these emissions may reduce national income and employment, because financing domestic renewable options requires higher electricity tariffs 57,58 . Lifting South Africa's restrictions on hydropower imports would reduce investment costs and economic losses 59 .…”

The Environmental and Economic Impact of the Carbon Tax in Australia

“…Notable research includes Beausejours et al (1992), Hamilton and Cameron (1994), Zhang (1998), Labandeira et al (2004), Wissema and Dellink (2007), and Devarajan et al (2011). Due to space limitations, we review studies with an Australian context.…”

Carbon taxation in Russia: Prospects for a double dividend and improved energy efficiency

“…For example, Devarajan et al (2011) show that the introduction of a carbon tax leads to less marginal costs of abatement compared to when energy taxes are levied. In contrast, if administrative costs of a targeted taxation are substantial, an indirect tax (a broad based tax) may be more efficient because its implementation is typically associated with less administrative costs, yet this is not so efficient in providing the "right" behavioural incentives compared to a targeted tax (e.g.…”