Tax revenues and the fiscal cost of trade liberalization, 1792–2006

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThis article examines the impact of trade liberalization on government revenues. Using a new dataset on tax revenues for 130 countries between 1792 and 2006, we identify ninety-nine episodes of trade liberalization defined as a large fall in trade tax revenues not accompanied by a decrease in trade. Seven took place before World War One, seven in the interwar period, eighteen in the Bretton Woods period and the remainder after 1970. We examine the extent to which countries were able to recover the tax revenues lost by liberalizing trade by using other sources of revenue. We find that historical (pre-1970) trade liberalization episodes were unlikely to be accompanied by decreases in tax revenues, especially during the Bretton Woods era. In the recent period however, over 40% of the developing countries in our sample experience a fall in total tax revenues that lasts more than ten years after an episode of trade liberalization. Overall, trade liberalization led to larger and longer-lived declines in tax revenues in developing countries since 1970 than in today's rich countries in the 19th and 20th centuries. Results are similar when we consider government expenditures, suggesting decreases in trade tax revenues negatively affect governments' capacity to provide public services in many developing countries.☆ The dataset constructed for this paper is available on the authors' websites. We are grateful to the Editor (Kris Mitchener) and to three anonymous referees for insightful comments. We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions from

Tax Me, but Spend Wisely? Sources of Public Finance and Government Accountability

“…I focus on the impact on public good provision of one institutional characteristic -government's capacity to tax -which has so far not been studied. 7 Relatedly, these findings also contribute to 4 See for example de Paula and Scheinkman (2010), Olken and Singhal (2011), Carrillo, Emran and Aparicio (2011), Kumler, Verhoogen and Fras (2015, Pomeranz (2015), Best et al (2015), Naritomi (2015), Khan, Khwaja and Olken (2015), Cagé and Gadenne (2015).…”

Trade Freedom and Revenue from Trade Taxes: a Cross-Country Analysis

“…Th e cross-country studies of Baunsgaard and Keen [2010] and Cage and Gadenne [2014] deserve a special mention. Baunsgaard and Keen [2010] used a panel data for 117 countries over 32 years in order to estimate the compensation of lost revenue (from trade liberalization) by income obtained from collection of domestic taxes.…”

“…Th ey found that high income countries have been recovered those revenues while middle and low income countries have been not. Cage and Gadenne [2014] used a novel dataset on total and trade tax revenues covering 130 countries from 1792 to 2006 in order to compare the fi scal cost of trade liberalization in developing countries and in today's rich countries at earlier stages of development. Th ey concluded that trade liberalization led to larger and longer-lived decreases in total tax revenues in developing countries since the 1970s than in rich countries in the 19 th and early 20 th centuries.…”

Does Trade Openness Contribute to Driving Financing Flows for Development?

“…This is because modest increases in trade tax revenue could be realized if the exemption regime were to be reviewed and if there was capacity to contain the disruptive impact of sharp exchange rate depreciations. Cagé and Gadenne (2014) compare the fiscal costs of trade liberalization in developing countries and in today's rich countries at earlier stages of development. They observe that trade liberalization seems to have come at a larger fiscal cost in today's developing countries, possibly because the countries reduced taxes on trade before having developed tax administrations capable of taxing domestic transactions on a large scale.…”