2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1045-2354(03)00008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxation in West Africa: transforming the colonial subject into the “governable person”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the long run, compliance with the British colonial regime was the equilibrium outcome, on average, since costs of non-compliance often outweighed 44 Note, while the main source of revenue for the British empire in West Africa was through custom duties, direct taxes played an important role in replenishing the Native Treasury which was managed by the Native Authorities. The role of direct taxes in revenue was even more significant in Northern Nigeria which had less access to the coast for trade than Southern Nigeria, though it featured prominently in both under the direction of the colonial official Sir Frederick Lugard (Bush and Maltby, 2004). See Appendix for details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the long run, compliance with the British colonial regime was the equilibrium outcome, on average, since costs of non-compliance often outweighed 44 Note, while the main source of revenue for the British empire in West Africa was through custom duties, direct taxes played an important role in replenishing the Native Treasury which was managed by the Native Authorities. The role of direct taxes in revenue was even more significant in Northern Nigeria which had less access to the coast for trade than Southern Nigeria, though it featured prominently in both under the direction of the colonial official Sir Frederick Lugard (Bush and Maltby, 2004). See Appendix for details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not the case in Southern Nigeria, where a diverse array of ethnoreligious groups and a looser tax structure, 49 made the area more fertile ground for missionary education. The rise of a new educated elite in the South, demanding accompanying political rights along with their new, often-times elevated status, 50 more quickly led to the erosion of the political authority of local 47 There is a very brief democratic period between 1960 and 1966, followed by a civil war and another very brief period of elections between 1979 and 1983, but the subsequent 30 years of post-colonial rule were characterized by autocratic military rule 48 Note this was a significant break with the practice in the 1850 period, as while the Emirate system was highly hierarchical, there had existed "various middlemen" in the "traditional" precolonial system who acted as checks on the power of the Emir (Mustapha, 2006;Dudley, 2013) 49 Taxes were often in the form of tributes between local elites rather than direct taxes on subjects as in the North (Bush and Maltby, 2004). 50 The new educated elites and the old traditional leaders/elites were often disjoint sets since distrust of British education meant that the traditional elites would often, initially, refuse to send their own children to the schools lest they be "corrupted" by the British colonials and would send their servants instead (Ayandele, 1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of analysis extends to a consideration of the role of accounting in the creation and sustaining of unequal power relations and the associated production of social and economic injustices, including the distribution and redistribution of resources. In these settings, accounting is considered as both practice and discourse that affect the way people act, think and make decisions (such as Richardson, 1987;Chew & Greer, 1997;Boyce, 2000;Neu, 2000;Bush & Maltby, 2004). …”
Section: Accounting and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it adds to our understanding of accounting, particularly tax accounting, in an imperial context. Unlike Hooper and Kearns [1997], Neu [1999Neu [ , 2000, Kalpagam [2000], Davie [2003], Bush and Maltby [2004], and Neu and Graham [2006], we are not concerned with the use of accounting to control the indigenous populations of colonies. The object of this investigation is imperial control over mid-18th century settler colonists.…”
Section: Figure 1 American Stamp Duties General Account By Virtue Of mentioning
confidence: 99%