2014
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxes, prices and illicit trade: the need for sound evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important measures to curb tobacco use which was found to be effective in developed and low income countries was to increase the tax on tobacco products. This could promote tobacco cessation or reduce the quantity of consumption among current users and dissuade youngsters from picking the habit [28, 29]. The Government of Kerala had increased the value added tax (VAT) of cigarettes in the years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015 to 15%, 20%, and 22%, respectively [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important measures to curb tobacco use which was found to be effective in developed and low income countries was to increase the tax on tobacco products. This could promote tobacco cessation or reduce the quantity of consumption among current users and dissuade youngsters from picking the habit [28, 29]. The Government of Kerala had increased the value added tax (VAT) of cigarettes in the years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015 to 15%, 20%, and 22%, respectively [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although we assumed that the price elasticity of tobacco is the same throughout all three countries, there is evidence to suggest that it may be higher in areas between countries with a large price differential, possibly reflecting increased large-scale illicit trade and cross-border purchasing 26 . However, the true extent of the effect of these factors on overall smoking prevalence continues to be debated 27,28 . We also assumed that individuals of the same age group would be similarly affected by a percentage price increase in all countries despite differences in earnings across countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a long and well-described tradition of the TI to use the threat of the illicit trade to compromise such evidence-based policies as tobacco tax and price regulations [ 5 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ], plain packaging [ 32 , 53 ], pictorial warnings [ 49 ], point-of-sale display bans [ 49 ], marketing regulations [ 54 ], flavour bans [ 49 , 55 ], pack size restrictions [ 56 ]. TI in particular often claims that taxes on tobacco products drive the illicit trade [ 5 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ], although there is a vast amount of evidence showing a limited relationship between higher tobacco prices and size of the illicit market [ 14 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%