Taxing land for urban containment: Reflections on a Dutch debate

Abstract

a b s t r a c tExcessive land use regulations aimed at containing urban sprawl have been criticised, because they may overcompensate for the external effects of uncontrolled greenfield development and contribute to stagnation in house building. Taxes on building in green spaces may be an instrument for balancing urban growth and the protection of the landscape. This paper discusses development tax and puts it in the context of other planning instruments. It reviews a recent policy debate in the Netherlands relating to the introduction of an open space tax and the research into this tax. It also investigates the policy process, which resulted in the tax not being introduced. Finally, conclusions are drawn as to whether the taxation of development may be a useful instrument to complement other planning measures.

Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: A comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy)

“…Urban sprawl caused by the conversion of farmland to urban uses may follow various spatial patterns: from spill-over or leapfrog in dense urban developments (Yaping, 2009;Altes, 2009) to the low-density scattering of buildings within agricultural areas (Millward, 2006;Gosnell et al, 2011). Many driving factors explain these various patterns.…”

Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012

“…However, there are potential concerns about the market impacts of land supply policies designed to manage the environmental impact of development; and perceived transaction costs associated with government intervention (Webster, 1998). Much of the empirical research in the field has been undertaken in the US and the UK (for example, see Bramley, 1998Bramley, , 2013Glaeser & Ward, 2009;Gyourko, Saiz, & Summers, 2008;White & Allmendinger, 2003), although there is an emerging body of contributions from other nations characterized by different systems of urban governance and housing provision, including Hong Kong (Hui & Ho, 2003), South Asia (Dowall & Ellis, 2009), Africa (Egbu, Omolaiye, & Gameson, 2007), and Europe (Altes, 2009). These diverse studies highlight the need to consider contextual differences in housing markets and land use regulation, both in examining relationships between planning and housing, and in transferring findings.…”

A transition to a denser and more sustainable city: Factors and actors in Trondheim, Norway

“…Examples include urban growth boundaries, other urban containment strategies (Dawkins & Nelson 2002;Millward 2006;Altes 2009), development rights, and land-value capture mechanisms (Suzuki et al 2015). Transport policy instruments also play a key role in urban intensification: they are commonly used to increase commuting cost by car while subsidising public transport (Goodwin 1981;Hupkes 1982;Brueckner 2000;May 2012).…”