Taxometric analysis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders

Abstract

Background With preparations currently being made for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM-5), one prominent issue to resolve is whether alcohol use disorders are better represented as discrete categorical entities or as a dimensional construct. The purpose of this study was to investigate the latent structure of DSM-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) and proposed DSM-5 alcohol use disorders. Methods The study used the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) to conduct taxometric analyses of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders defined by different thresholds to determine the taxonic or dimensional structure underlying the disorders. Results DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol abuse and dependence criteria with 3+ thresholds demonstrated a dimensional structure. Corresponding thresholds with 4+ criteria were clearly taxonic, as were thresholds defined by cut-offs of 5+ and 6+ criteria. Conclusions DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders demonstrated a hybrid taxonic-dimensional structure. That is, DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders may be taxonically distinct compared to no disorder if defined by a threshold of 4 or more criteria. However, there may be dimensional variation remaining among non-problematic to subclinical cases. A careful and systematic program of structural research using taxometric and psychometric procedures is warranted.

Independent and combined associations of risky single-occasion drinking and drinking volume with alcohol use disorder: Evidence from a sample of young Swiss men

“…A summary score of criteria was used (from 0 to 11) instead of the cut-offs described in the DSM-5. Previous studies reported that a continuous dimension better fitted AUD than a categorical one (Kerridge et al, 2013).…”

Concurrent Versus Simultaneous Use of Alcohol and Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs: Is Simultaneous Use Worse for Mental, Social, and Health Issues?

“…For the previous 12 months, alcohol dependence was assessed with the seven criteria of alcohol dependence from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) as in Knight et al (2002). We used a continuous numbered scale of the seven criteria (from 0 to 7), instead of a cut-off, because current literature assumes a more continuous dimensional construct to alcohol dependence rather than a categorical model (Knight et al 2002;Kerridge et al 2013).…”

Simultaneous use of Alcohol, Tobacco and Cannabis in Relation to Severity of Substance Dependence: A Study among Young Swiss Men

“…We used a continuous numbered scale of criteria (from 0 "no symptom of dependence" to 7 "high number of symptoms of dependence") instead of a cut-off of 3 or more criteria. This was because current literature assumes a more continuous dimensional construct to alcohol dependence rather than a categorical model [25], and because alcohol dependence may not yet have been diagnosed in such young populations. The level of alcohol use was measured by drinking volume (usual quantity multiplied by frequency of alcohol use) and frequency of risky single-occasion drinking (RSOD, i.e.…”