2005
DOI: 10.3354/meps288009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxon-specific differences in photoacclimation to fluctuating irradiance in an Antarctic diatom and a green flagellate

Abstract: Photoacclimation towards rapid changes in irradiance was studied in 2 Antarctic microalgae, the diatom Chaetoceros brevis (Bacillariophyceae) and the flagellate Pyramimonas sp. (Prasinophyceae). Both species were subjected to 3 different light regimes. Two regimes of vertical mixing (1:1 h and 3:3 h high light:low light) were superimposed on a diurnal light cycle mimicking the solar sine. For both species, maximum growth was recorded at the fastest rates of light fluctuation (1:1 h). The light regimes had a mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and potential diurnal variation in the vertical distribution of phytoplankton due to phototactic motility (Tilzer 1973) introduces additional uncertainty into estimates of the spectral irradiance history of the epilimnetic communities we sampled. Alternatively, if the differences in e k we determined reflect acclimation of phytoplankton to the maximum rather than mean irradiance experienced (van Leeuwe et al 2005), then it would not be surprising that DOC was a better predictor of e k values than Ē % UVR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3) and potential diurnal variation in the vertical distribution of phytoplankton due to phototactic motility (Tilzer 1973) introduces additional uncertainty into estimates of the spectral irradiance history of the epilimnetic communities we sampled. Alternatively, if the differences in e k we determined reflect acclimation of phytoplankton to the maximum rather than mean irradiance experienced (van Leeuwe et al 2005), then it would not be surprising that DOC was a better predictor of e k values than Ē % UVR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, our results showed that S. minutulus, N. acicularis, and L. redekei did change their P-I curves under fluctuating light to compensate for this. Enhanced rates of photosynthesis would also lead to higher maintenance costs (van Leeuwe et al 2005;Dimier et al 2009), which could also contribute to a decrease in growth rates. Accordingly, the reason that some authors found no change in growth rates under fluctuating light compared to a constant or sinusoidal regime of the same average irradiance and photoperiod (Litchman 2000;HavelkovaDousova et al 2004;Dimier et al 2009) may have been that the degree of saturation of photosynthesis was similar in the respective regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eluent B consisted of acetonitrile and acetone (45 : 55). Sixty microliters of extract was injected with a water packing of 20 mL before and 10 mL after the sample (Wright et al 1997;van Leeuwe et al 2006). Chl a from Anacystis nidulans (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early in the season, irradiance levels below sea ice are low, due to the low angle of incoming solar radiation and as snow cover may attenuate irradiance (Palmisano et al, 1987). Microalgae can acclimate to low irradiance levels by expansion of the light-harvesting complexes and adjustment of the pigment composition (Van Leeuwe et al, 2005;Van Leeuwe and Stefels, 2007;AlouFont et al, 2013). Changes in the structure of the photosynthetic units may be accompanied by a decrease in their numbers (Barlow et al, 1988;Thomas et al, 1992).…”
Section: Sea Ice As a Habitat For Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%