1995
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051020.x-i1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic and Conservation Status of the Yuma Mountain Lion

Abstract: Confusion persists over the taxonomic status and viability of the Yuma mountain lion (Felis concolor browni). We conducted a review of the literature on lions in the American Southwest and interviewed resource and public‐land managers and wildlife researchers to help us understand the current status of the Yuma mountain lion. We also contacted museums and assembled the most complete set of morphometric data on the Yuma mountain lion. Few if any breeding female lions, a paucity of prey, and a lack of suitable h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An uninterrupted distribution of resident individuals apparently was not neceRsary to maintain demographic linkages between disjunct breeding populations as long as they occasionally exchanged individuals. A poor understanding of species distribution and carnivore dispersal behavior may have led to the erroneous description of Puma concolor browni, which was based on a small number of individuals that likely dispersed occasionally from populations of P. c. azteca, P. c koibabensis, and P. c. ca4/ornica and were traveling through poor quality desert habitat (McIvor et al 1995). Today, the South Florida landscape contains anthropogenic barriers ranging from dredged river channels, canals, and highways to cities and expansive agricultural monocultures.…”
Section: Dispersal Characterist[csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An uninterrupted distribution of resident individuals apparently was not neceRsary to maintain demographic linkages between disjunct breeding populations as long as they occasionally exchanged individuals. A poor understanding of species distribution and carnivore dispersal behavior may have led to the erroneous description of Puma concolor browni, which was based on a small number of individuals that likely dispersed occasionally from populations of P. c. azteca, P. c koibabensis, and P. c. ca4/ornica and were traveling through poor quality desert habitat (McIvor et al 1995). Today, the South Florida landscape contains anthropogenic barriers ranging from dredged river channels, canals, and highways to cities and expansive agricultural monocultures.…”
Section: Dispersal Characterist[csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mountain lions Puma concolor were previously thought to be transient in southwestern Arizona, United States (Shaw et al 1988;Germaine et al 2000). Additionally, there was uncertainty over whether a distinct subspecies, the Yuma puma P. c. brownii, occurred in that region (McIvor et al 1995). Culver et al (2000) subsumed subspecies designations for mountain lions in North America (north of Nicaragua), from 15 subspecies to only 1-P. c. couguar, based on genetic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%