2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This differentiation might be based on perceptual/visual attributes (natural kinds) and functional/motor features (artifacts), i.e., object knowledge is organized around sensory and functional features as suggested by the sensory-motor hypothesis [Warrington and Shallice, 1984]. However, according to the results of the current study and results of earlier studies [e.g, Kahlaoui et al, 2007;Sass et al, 2009b] these differences between distinct objects domains (living, non-living) and categories (animals, tools) should be independent of presentation modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This differentiation might be based on perceptual/visual attributes (natural kinds) and functional/motor features (artifacts), i.e., object knowledge is organized around sensory and functional features as suggested by the sensory-motor hypothesis [Warrington and Shallice, 1984]. However, according to the results of the current study and results of earlier studies [e.g, Kahlaoui et al, 2007;Sass et al, 2009b] these differences between distinct objects domains (living, non-living) and categories (animals, tools) should be independent of presentation modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is worth noting that the involvement of the temporoparietal junction -known to be involved in motion, action and spatial processing -has been consistently revealed across several studies (de Zubicaray et al, 2013;Mirman and Grazanio, 2012b;Schwartz et al, 2011). Concerning the neural correlates of semantic priming for taxonomic and thematic relationships in lexical-decision tasks, several fMRI studies (Kotz et al, 2002;Sachs et al, 2008b;Sass et al, 2009) revealed that taxonomic relationships require the recruitment of additional areas in the right hemisphere, interpreted as reflecting a more effortful semantic processing than for thematic one. Contrasted to thematic relationships, taxonomic processing resulted in enhanced activations in cuneus (Kotz et al, 2002) -in accordance with Kalénine et al (2009) -precuneus (Kotz et al, 2002Sachs et al, 2008b) and isthmus of cingulate gyrus (Kotz et al, 2002) and was interpreted as relying on perceptual processing, episodic memory retrieval and on detection of semantic relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is evidence supporting the existence of functionally and neuroanatomically distinct taxonomic and thematic semantic systems (de Zubicaray, Hansen, & McMahon, 2013; Kalénine et al, 2009; Lewis, Poeppel, & Murphy, 2015; Mirman & Graziano, 2012a; Sass, Sachs, Krach, & Kircher, 2009; Schwartz et al, 2011; but see Jackson, Hoffman, Pobric, & Lambon Ralph, 2015). Schwartz and colleagues (2011) investigated the brain regions responsible for taxonomic and thematic semantic errors during picture naming in a large sample of aphasic patients with left hemisphere regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%