2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic changes and non-native species: An overview of constraints and new challenges for macroinvertebrate-based indices calculation in river ecosystems

Abstract: Biomonitoring tools are required to address new and critical changes to rivers • Taxonomic constraints and non-native species represent new biomonitoring challenges • Existing tools need to be flexible so new scientific developments can be integrated • Mismatches in status classifications may affect management and conservation policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, range expansions of many established INNS are occurring in line with ongoing anthropogenic modifications and climatic change (Seebens et al, 2017). Current freshwater monitoring methods are often associated with physical sightings or sampling of organisms which can lead to some INNS being overlooked in the early stages of invasion, or when species abundance is low (Guareschi & Wood, 2019; Havel et al, 2015). Moreover, identification of many INNS relies on knowledge of morphological identification features which can lead to cryptic, juvenile, or closely related species being overlooked (Blackman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Monitoring and Managing The Spread Of Innsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, range expansions of many established INNS are occurring in line with ongoing anthropogenic modifications and climatic change (Seebens et al, 2017). Current freshwater monitoring methods are often associated with physical sightings or sampling of organisms which can lead to some INNS being overlooked in the early stages of invasion, or when species abundance is low (Guareschi & Wood, 2019; Havel et al, 2015). Moreover, identification of many INNS relies on knowledge of morphological identification features which can lead to cryptic, juvenile, or closely related species being overlooked (Blackman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Monitoring and Managing The Spread Of Innsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive species are widely recognized as one of the primary threats to biodiversity globally due to their wide‐ranging ecological effects for individual populations and communities of native taxa, through to entire ecosystem functioning (Carbonell et al., 2017; Flood, Duran, Barton, Mercado‐Molina, & Trexler, 2020). However, managing the threat of invasive species remains an open challenge for biological conservation, biodiversity assessments, biomonitoring and restoration practices (Bruno et al., 2019; Guareschi & Wood, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orendt et al., 2010). Invasive species may constitute significant threats to the integrity of aquatic ecosystems that existing biomonitoring tools were not designed to address and may fail to detect their effects or presence within a waterbody (Guareschi & Wood, 2019; MacNeil et al., 2010; Vandekerkhove et al., 2013). Moreover, the integration of their presence and associated information into official biomonitoring and management frameworks has been applied heterogeneously internationally (Boon et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extence et al., 1999; Hawkes, 1998). These scoring systems rarely recognise or integrate invasive invertebrate taxa, largely because their effect may be context specific and the dynamics of their spread difficult to assess and integrate within legislation (Guareschi & Wood, 2019). For example, Mathers et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation