2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic classification of metagenomic shotgun sequences with CARMA3

Abstract: The vast majority of microbes are unculturable and thus cannot be sequenced by means of traditional methods. High-throughput sequencing techniques like 454 or Solexa-Illumina make it possible to explore those microbes by studying whole natural microbial communities and analysing their biological diversity as well as the underlying metabolic pathways. Over the past few years, different methods have been developed for the taxonomic and functional characterization of metagenomic shotgun sequences. However, the ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Current methods for classifying metagenomic samples rely on one or more of three general approaches: composition or pattern matching (McHardy et al 2007;Brady and Salzberg 2009;Segata et al 2012), taxonomic mapping (Huson et al 2007;Meyer et al 2008;Monzoorul Haque et al 2009;Gerlach and Stoye 2011;Patil et al 2012;Segata et al 2012), and whole-genome assembly (Kostic et al 2011;Bhaduri et al 2012). Composition and patternmatching algorithms use predetermined patterns in the data, such as taxonomic clade markers (Segata et al 2012), k-mer frequency, or GC content, often coupled with sophisticated classification algorithms such as support vector machines (McHardy et al 2007;Patil et al 2012) or interpolated Markov Models (Brady and Salzberg 2009) to classify reads to the species of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods for classifying metagenomic samples rely on one or more of three general approaches: composition or pattern matching (McHardy et al 2007;Brady and Salzberg 2009;Segata et al 2012), taxonomic mapping (Huson et al 2007;Meyer et al 2008;Monzoorul Haque et al 2009;Gerlach and Stoye 2011;Patil et al 2012;Segata et al 2012), and whole-genome assembly (Kostic et al 2011;Bhaduri et al 2012). Composition and patternmatching algorithms use predetermined patterns in the data, such as taxonomic clade markers (Segata et al 2012), k-mer frequency, or GC content, often coupled with sophisticated classification algorithms such as support vector machines (McHardy et al 2007;Patil et al 2012) or interpolated Markov Models (Brady and Salzberg 2009) to classify reads to the species of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[154][155][156][157]. The third method is based on the assembly of the obtained contigs into genes or even genomes de novo [158,159].…”
Section: Review Evolution Of Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature on taxonomic classification, the sequence similarity search of BLAST is a computational bottleneck (Gerlach & Stoye 2011). Therefore, we used the customized viral database for a BLAST search to investigate how much the computational time was reduced and whether the conventional LCA could identify the infecting viruses.…”
Section: Taxonomic Classification Using the Lca With Blastn Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOrt-ITEMS (Monzoorul Haque et al 2009) and CARMA3 (Gerlach & Stoye 2011) methods extended the LCA using a reciprocal BLAST search to reduce false positives in assignments. CARMA3 introduced the concept of the mutation rate into the LCA algorithm, and reinforced the reciprocal BLAST search to identify a novel taxon, relatives of which are numbered (Gerlach & Stoye 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation