1990
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1990.4308155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
195
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Products within a category generally become homogenized as multibusiness firms come to dominate. Research on strategic groups suggests that similar organizations offer products with similar intrinsic appeal (Porac and Thomas 1990;Rosa, Porac, Runser-Spanjol, and Saxon 1999). Rivalry runs stronger among firms within a category than between companies in different categories.…”
Section: Concentration Of Ownership Type and Homogeneity Of Offeringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products within a category generally become homogenized as multibusiness firms come to dominate. Research on strategic groups suggests that similar organizations offer products with similar intrinsic appeal (Porac and Thomas 1990;Rosa, Porac, Runser-Spanjol, and Saxon 1999). Rivalry runs stronger among firms within a category than between companies in different categories.…”
Section: Concentration Of Ownership Type and Homogeneity Of Offeringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate identity affects how managers both interpret and react to environmental circumstances (Meyer, 1982;Dutton and Dukerich, 1991). Shared cultural values and a strong sense of identity therefore guide managers, not only in defining what their firms stand for, but in justifying their strategies for interacting with key stakeholders (Miles and Cameron, 1982;Porac and Thomas, 1990).…”
Section: The Organizational Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These belief structures are automatically created, as the managers need tools to face the complexity of their environment and information in it [18]. There is plenty of research focusing on the managerial cognitions and their outcomes which has created path for the present studies [19], [20], [2]. The research interests have been, for example, on following questions: how managers" attention guides action in organization [21], [22], how managers" cognition affects the strategy process [2], and how different strategic thinking effect the strategy development and implementation (see Walsh [11] for a review).…”
Section: B Cognitions In Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, from a decision making perspective, it is suggested that strategic decision making and implementation are both improved through managers" sharing homogenous cognitions of competition e.g. [20], developed and collective cognitive cognitions among top management increases the effectiveness of decision making [16], help attainment of objectives and learning in complex situations [26], and support handling the uncertainty inherent in decision making [27].…”
Section: B Cognitions In Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%